Schweisfurth, M. , Thomas, M. A.M. and Smail, A. (2022) Revisiting comparative pedagogy: methodologies, themes, and research communities since 2000. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 52(4), pp. 560-580. (doi: 10.1080/03057925.2020.1797475)
![]() |
Text
220762.pdf - Accepted Version 431kB | |
|
Text
220762Suppl.pdf - Supplemental Material 266kB |
Abstract
This article provides an analysis of contemporary comparative research on pedagogy, as published since 2000. It explores this sub-field of comparative education inquiry over this period, including how it has responded to new global movements, changing balances of power, and methodological advances. While these have shaped the field in recognisable ways, differing responses to these among researchers from contrasting research traditions have resulted in divergence as well as convergence. This divergence has created distinct typologies of studies that reflect particular epistemic communities of researchers, depending on how context and the purpose of research are perceived. The scoping review is based on a survey of 51 articles identified through a systematic search of 10 English-language journals in the field of comparative and international education.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Thomas, Dr Matthew and Smail, Ms Amy and Schweisfurth, Professor Michele |
Authors: | Schweisfurth, M., Thomas, M. A.M., and Smail, A. |
College/School: | College of Social Sciences > School of Education College of Social Sciences > School of Education > Educational Leadership & Policy |
Journal Name: | Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education |
Publisher: | Taylor & Francis |
ISSN: | 0305-7925 |
ISSN (Online): | 1469-3623 |
Published Online: | 07 August 2020 |
Copyright Holders: | Copyright © 2020 British Association for International and Comparative Education |
First Published: | First published in Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 52(4): 560-580 |
Publisher Policy: | Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record