Gjestland, A., McArthur, D. P., Osland, L. and Thorsen, I. (2014) The suitability of hedonic models for cost-benefit analysis: evidence from commuting flows. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 61, pp. 136-151. (doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2014.01.006)
Full text not currently available from Enlighten.
Abstract
We compare two estimates of benefits arising from the construction of new bridges in south-west Norway. One estimate comes from a hedonic property value model. Rather than follow an approach which is strictly theoretically correct, we adopt Rosen’s simple first-stage approach. To investigate and validate whether this simplified approach gives a reasonable estimate, we compare it to an estimate derived from a travel demand model. We find that a variant of an ex post hedonic house price model gives very similar estimates to the estimates from the travel demand model. This supports a hypothesis that the simplistic hedonic approach is reasonable.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Mcarthur, Dr David |
Authors: | Gjestland, A., McArthur, D. P., Osland, L., and Thorsen, I. |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HA Statistics H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory |
College/School: | College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences |
Journal Name: | Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice |
Publisher: | Elsevier Ltd. |
ISSN: | 0965-8564 |
ISSN (Online): | 1879-2375 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record