Can ante rem structuralism solve the access problem?

MacBride, F. (2008) Can ante rem structuralism solve the access problem? Philosophical Quarterly, 58(230), pp. 155-164. (doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.524.x)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Publisher's URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.524.x

Abstract

Ante rem structuralism is the doctrine that mathematics describes a realm of abstract (structural) universals. According to its proponents, appeal to the existence of these universals provides a source of distinctive insight into the epistemology of mathematics, in particular insight into the so-called ‘access problem’ of explaining how mathematicians can reliably access truths about an abstract realm to which they cannot travel and from which they receive no signals. Stewart Shapiro offers the most developed version of this view to date. Through an examination of Shapiro's proposed structuralist epistemology for mathematics I argue that ante rem structuralism fails to provide the ingredients for a satisfactory resolution of the access problem for infinite structures (whether small or large).

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Macbride, Professor Fraser
Authors: MacBride, F.
College/School:College of Arts & Humanities > School of Humanities > Philosophy
Journal Name:Philosophical Quarterly
Publisher:Wiley
ISSN:0031-8094
ISSN (Online):1467-9213

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record