Men’s, but not women’s, sociosexual orientation predicts couples' perceptions of sexually dimorphic cues in own-sex faces

Kandrik, M., Fincher, C. L., Jones, B. C. and DeBruine, L. M. (2014) Men’s, but not women’s, sociosexual orientation predicts couples' perceptions of sexually dimorphic cues in own-sex faces. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(5), pp. 965-971. (doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0202-1)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

Previous research suggests that people’s perceptions of own-sex individuals can change according to within-individual variation in their romantic partners’ sexual strategies. For example, men are more likely to perceive other men’s faces as looking particularly dominant during the fertile phase of their partner’s menstrual cycle, when women tend to be more open to uncommitted sexual relationships. By contrast, little is known about how relatively stable between-individuals differences in partners’ openness to uncommitted sexual relationships (i.e., their sociosexual orientation) predict perceptions of own-sex individuals. The revised Sociosexual Orientation Inventory (SOI-R) assesses individuals’ openness to uncommitted sexual relationships and shows high test–retest reliability over long periods of time. Consequently, we tested whether the SOI-R scores of men and women in heterosexual romantic couples predicted their perceptions of own-sex faces displaying exaggerated sex-typical cues. Men’s, but not women’s, SOI-R was positively correlated with the extent to which both the man and woman within a couple ascribed high dominance and attractiveness to own-sex faces with exaggerated sex-typical cues. In other words, individuals in couples where the man reported being particularly open to uncommitted sexual relationships were more likely to ascribe dominance and attractiveness to own-sex individuals displaying a putative cue of good phenotypic condition. These findings suggest that both men’s and women’s perceptions of potential competitors for mates are sensitive to the male partner’s sexual strategy. Such individual differences in perceptions may benefit men’s ability to compete for extra-pair and/or replacement mates and benefit women’s mate guarding behaviors.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:DeBruine, Professor Lisa and Jones, Professor Benedict and Fincher, Dr Corey
Authors: Kandrik, M., Fincher, C. L., Jones, B. C., and DeBruine, L. M.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Psychology & Neuroscience
Journal Name:Archives of Sexual Behavior
Publisher:Springer US
ISSN:0004-0002
ISSN (Online):1573-2800

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record

Project CodeAward NoProject NamePrincipal InvestigatorFunder's NameFunder RefLead Dept
604381OCMATE: Do oral contraceptives alter women's mate preferences?Benedict JonesEuropean Research Council (ERC)OCMATE FP7ERC28RI NEUROSCIENCE & PSYCHOLOGY
629591Preference versus choice: How experimental tests of face preferences relate to actual partner choiceLisa DebruineEconomic & Social Research Council (ESRC)ES/I031022/2RI NEUROSCIENCE & PSYCHOLOGY