Knight, C. (2013) Luck egalitarianism. Philosophy Compass, 8(10), pp. 924-934. (doi: 10.1111/phc3.12077)
|
Text
87664.pdf - Accepted Version 151kB |
Abstract
Luck egalitarianism is a family of egalitarian theories of distributive justice that aim to counteract the distributive effects of luck. This article explains luck egalitarianism's main ideas, and the debates that have accompanied its rise to prominence. There are two main parts to the discussion. The first part sets out three key moves in the influential early statements of Dworkin, Arneson, and Cohen: the brute luck/option luck distinction, the specification of brute luck in everyday or theoretical terms and the specification of advantage as resources, welfare, or some combination of these. The second part covers three later developments: the democratic egalitarian critique of luck egalitarianism, the luck egalitarian acceptance of pluralism, and luck egalitarian doubts about the significance of the brute luck/option luck distinction.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Additional Information: | This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Philosophy Compass 8(10):924-934, which has been published in final form at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12077. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. |
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Knight, Dr Carl |
Authors: | Knight, C. |
College/School: | College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences > Politics |
Journal Name: | Philosophy Compass |
Publisher: | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc. |
ISSN: | 1747-9991 |
ISSN (Online): | 1747-9991 |
Copyright Holders: | Copyright © 2013 The Author |
First Published: | First published in Philosophy Compass 8(10):924-934 |
Publisher Policy: | Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record