Thompson, D., Scheepers, C. and Myachykov, A. (2012) Get-versus be-passives in English: a functional investigation. In: Psycholinguistics in Flanders (PiF2012), Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 6-7 Jun 2012,
Full text not currently available from Enlighten.
Publisher's URL: http://www.pif2012.ruhosting.nl/index.html
Abstract
We report evidence from syntactic priming showing that speakers produce more be-passive responses after full-passive primes than after truncated-passive primes. Since a comparable main effect was absent in get-passive responses, this suggests that by-phrase inclusion supports the use of be- but not of get-passives (in line with corpus data). Most importantly, our analyses revealed an auxiliary-repetition main effect (more be-passive responses after be-passive primes and more get-passive responses after get-passive primes). Our findings suggest that, although the same syntactic representation may underlie both passives in early development, these forms later become associated with distinct construction types susceptible to their own lexically-specific auxiliary priming effects.
Item Type: | Conference Proceedings |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Scheepers, Dr Christoph and Myachykov, Dr Andriy |
Authors: | Thompson, D., Scheepers, C., and Myachykov, A. |
College/School: | College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Psychology & Neuroscience |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record