Weir, A. (2013) Quine's naturalism. In: Harman, G. and Lepore, E. (eds.) A Companion to W.V.O. Quine. Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester, pp. 114-147. ISBN 9780470672105 (doi: 10.1002/9781118607992)
Full text not currently available from Enlighten.
Publisher's URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781118607992
Abstract
Starting with the distinction between epistemological and ontological naturalism, this chapter focuses most on Quine’s epistemological naturalism, not the ontological anti-naturalism he thought it leads to. It is argued that naturalised epistemology is not central to Quine’s epistemology. Quine’s key epistemological principle is:- follow the methods of science, and only those. Can Quine demarcate scientific methods from non-scientific ones? The problems which have been raised here, e.g. in the case of mathematics, are considered. A main theme is the relationship between Quine’s naturalism and reductionist forms of ‘scientistic’ naturalism. Quine is generally taken to be an anti-reductionist, unsurprisingly given his explicit anti-reductionist pronouncements from ‘Two Dogmas’ onwards. It is argued that the situation is more complex than this and that key Quinean arguments are driven by a positivistic reductionism he never entirely broke free from.
Item Type: | Book Sections |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Weir, Professor Alan |
Authors: | Weir, A. |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) |
College/School: | College of Arts & Humanities > School of Humanities > Philosophy |
Publisher: | Wiley-Blackwell |
ISBN: | 9780470672105 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record