White, D.R., McDermott, J., Castelli, M., Manzoni, L., Goldman, B.W., Kronberger, G., Jaśkowski, W., O’Reilly, U.-M. and Luke, S. (2013) Better GP benchmarks: community survey results and proposals. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, 14(1), pp. 3-29. (doi: 10.1007/s10710-012-9177-2)
Full text not currently available from Enlighten.
Abstract
We present the results of a community survey regarding genetic programming benchmark practices. Analysis shows broad consensus that improvement is needed in problem selection and experimental rigor. While views expressed in the survey dissuade us from proposing a large-scale benchmark suite, we find community support for creating a "blacklist" of problems which are in common use but have important flaws, and whose use should therefore be discouraged. We propose a set of possible replacement problems.
| Item Type: | Articles |
|---|---|
| Status: | Published |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | White, Dr David |
| Authors: | White, D.R., McDermott, J., Castelli, M., Manzoni, L., Goldman, B.W., Kronberger, G., Jaśkowski, W., O’Reilly, U.-M., and Luke, S. |
| College/School: | College of Science and Engineering > School of Computing Science |
| Journal Name: | Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines |
| Publisher: | Springer Verlag |
| ISSN: | 1389-2576 |
| ISSN (Online): | 1573-7632 |
| Published Online: | 18 December 2012 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record
Deposit and Record Details
Deposit and Record Details