Twine, R. (2005) Constructing critical bioethics by deconstructing culture/nature dualism. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 8(3), pp. 285-295. (doi: 10.1007/s11019-004-7812-2)
Full text not currently available from Enlighten.
Abstract
This paper seeks to respond to some of the recent criticisms directed toward bioethics by offering a contribution to a “critical bioethics”. Here this concept is principally defined in terms of the three features of interdisciplinarity, self-reflexivity and the avoidance of uncritical complicity. In a partial reclamation of the ideas of V.R. Potter, it is argued that a critical bioethics requires a meaningful challenge to culture/nature dualism, expressed in bioethics as the distinction between medical ethics and ecological ethics. Such a contesting of the “bio” in bioethics arrests its ethical bracketing of environmental and animal ethics. Taken together, the triadic definition of a critical bioethics offered here provides a potential framework with which to fend off critiques of commercial capture or of being “too close to science” commonly directed toward bioethics.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Additional Information: | The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com |
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Twine, Dr Richard |
Authors: | Twine, R. |
College/School: | College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences |
Journal Name: | Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy |
ISSN: | 1386-7423 |
ISSN (Online): | 1572-8633 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record