Wilkinson, H., Gallagher, M. and Smith, M. (2012) A collaborative approach to defining the usefulness of impact: lessons from a knowledge exchange project involving academics and social work practitioners. Evidence and Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 8(3), pp. 311-327. (doi: 10.1332/174426412X654040)
Full text not currently available from Enlighten.
Abstract
This paper reports on a knowledge exchange project involving academics and practitioners in six local authority social work departments. It contributes to recent debates about the coproduction of knowledge, presenting findings in three key areas: the importance of relationships for knowledge exchange; 'what works' for practitioners engaging with academics; and the value of practitioner research for enabling knowledge exchange. It also considers the assessment of 'impact' against the shifting landscape of the Research Excellence Framework, arguing that academic and performance management notions of impact and research quality risk eclipsing the perspectives of research users.
| Item Type: | Articles |
|---|---|
| Status: | Published |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Gallagher, Dr Michael |
| Authors: | Wilkinson, H., Gallagher, M., and Smith, M. |
| College/School: | College of Science and Engineering > School of Geographical and Earth Sciences > Geography |
| Journal Name: | Evidence and Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice |
| Publisher: | The Policy Press |
| ISSN: | 1744-2648 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record
Deposit and Record Details
Deposit and Record Details