Entitlement and evidence

Smith, M. (2013) Entitlement and evidence. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 91(4), pp. 735-753. (doi: 10.1080/00048402.2012.732094)

Abstract

Entitlement is conceived as a kind of positive epistemic status, attaching to certain propositions, that involves no cognitive or intellectual accomplishment on the part of the beneficiary—a status that is in place by default. In this paper I will argue that the notion of entitlement—or something very like it—falls out of an idea that may at first blush seem rather disparate: that the evidential support relation can be understood as a kind of variably strict conditional (in the sense of Lewis 1973). Lewis provided a general recipe for deriving what he termed inner modalities from any variably strict conditional governed by a logic meeting certain constraints. On my proposal, entitlement need be nothing more exotic than the inner necessity associated with evidential support. Understanding entitlement in this way helps to answer some common concerns—in particular, the concern that entitlement could only be a pragmatic, and not genuinely epistemic, status.<p></p>

• Item Type: Articles
• Status: Published
• Refereed: Yes
• Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: Smith, Dr Martin
• Authors: Smith, M.
• College/School: College of Arts & Humanities > School of Humanities > Philosophy
• Journal Name: Australasian Journal of Philosophy
• Publisher: Taylor & Francis
• ISSN: 0004-8402
• ISSN (Online): 1471-6828
• Published Online: 05 November 2012