The domain of authority

Knowles, D.R. (2007) The domain of authority. Philosophy, 82(1), pp. 23-43. (doi: 10.1017/S0031819107319025)

[img] Text
knowles.pdf

147kB

Publisher's URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031819107319025

Abstract

If the commands of authority are peremptory and content-independent directives, it is a great puzzle why any rational autonomous agent should accept them as morally binding, as Robert Paul Wolff and others have argued. I analyse the peremptory and content-independent quality of authoritative directives and argue that all earthly authorities operate within a specified domain. I investigate three candidates for the role of universally applicable boundary conditions–morality, harm to self, and absurdity. I conclude that commands are authoritative only when intra vires, i.e. issued within the proper domain of the authority. Wolff's challenge is not met, hut it is shown to be less forbidding.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Knowles, Professor Dudley
Authors: Knowles, D.R.
Subjects:B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics
College/School:College of Arts & Humanities > School of Humanities > Philosophy
Journal Name:Philosophy
Publisher:Cambridge University Press
ISSN:0031-8191
ISSN (Online):1469-817X
Copyright Holders:©2007 Cambridge University Press
First Published:First published in Philosophy 82(1):23-43
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record