Knowles, D.R. (2007) The domain of authority. Philosophy, 82(1), pp. 23-43. (doi: 10.1017/S0031819107319025)
Text
knowles.pdf 147kB |
Publisher's URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031819107319025
Abstract
If the commands of authority are peremptory and content-independent directives, it is a great puzzle why any rational autonomous agent should accept them as morally binding, as Robert Paul Wolff and others have argued. I analyse the peremptory and content-independent quality of authoritative directives and argue that all earthly authorities operate within a specified domain. I investigate three candidates for the role of universally applicable boundary conditions–morality, harm to self, and absurdity. I conclude that commands are authoritative only when intra vires, i.e. issued within the proper domain of the authority. Wolff's challenge is not met, hut it is shown to be less forbidding.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Knowles, Professor Dudley |
Authors: | Knowles, D.R. |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics |
College/School: | College of Arts & Humanities > School of Humanities > Philosophy |
Journal Name: | Philosophy |
Publisher: | Cambridge University Press |
ISSN: | 0031-8191 |
ISSN (Online): | 1469-817X |
Copyright Holders: | ©2007 Cambridge University Press |
First Published: | First published in Philosophy 82(1):23-43 |
Publisher Policy: | Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record