Post-Foucauldian governmentality: what does it offer critical social policy analysis?

McKee, K. (2009) Post-Foucauldian governmentality: what does it offer critical social policy analysis? Critical Social Policy, 29(3), pp. 465-486. (doi: 10.1177/0261018309105180)

[img]
Preview
Text
6331.pdf - Accepted Version

128kB

Publisher's URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261018309105180

Abstract

This article considers the theoretical perspective of post-Foucauldian governmentality, especially the insights and challenges it poses for applied researchers within the critical social policy tradition. The article firstly examines the analytical strengths of this approach to understanding power and rule in contemporary society, before moving on to consider its limitations for social policy. It concludes by arguing that these insights can be retained, and some of the weaknesses overcome, by adopting a ‘realist governmentality’ approach (Stenson 2005, 2008). This advocates combining traditional discursive analysis with more ethnographic methods in order to render visible the concrete activity of governing, and unravel the messiness, complexity and unintended consequences involved in the struggles around subjectivity.

Item Type:Articles
Keywords:Ethnography, Foucault, governing, governmentality, power, resistance.
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:McKee, Dr Kimberly
Authors: McKee, K.
Subjects:H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
J Political Science > JC Political theory
H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare
College/School:College of Science and Engineering > School of Geographical and Earth Sciences
Journal Name:Critical Social Policy
Publisher:Sage
ISSN:0261-0183
ISSN (Online):1461-703X
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2009 Sage
First Published:First published in Critical Social Policy 29(3):465-486
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher
Related URLs:

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record