AEA Consulting (2005). Tyne and Wear Museums, Bristol's Museums, Galleries & Archives. Social impact programme assessment. Online: Museums Libraries Archives North East.
Anglia Ruskin/UCLAN Research Team (2005). Mental health, social inclusion and the arts: developing the evidence base. Final report from Phase 1: the state of the art in England. Online: National Social Inclusion Programme.
Anglia Ruskin/UCLAN Research Team (2006a). Mental health, social inclusion and arts: developing the evidence base. Interim report from Phase 2: retrospective analysis of project data. Online: National Social Inclusion Programme.
Anglia Ruskin/UCLAN Research Team (2006b). Mental health, social inclusion and the arts. Second interim report from Phase Two: baseline results. Online: National Social Inclusion Programme.
Anglia Ruskin/UCLAN Research Team (2007a). Mental health, social inclusion and the arts: developing the evidence base. Final report. Online: National Social Exclusion Programme.
Anglia Ruskin/UCLAN Research Team (2007b). 'Case studies: Exploring the processes, benefits and outcomes of arts participation'.' Unpublished report from the study 'Mental health, social inclusion and arts: developing the evidence base'. Unpublished. Available from hspandler@uclan.ac.uk.
Australian Expert Group in Industry Studies of the University of Western Australia (2004). Social impacts of participation in the arts and cultural activities. Stage two report: evidence, issue and recommendations Online: Cultural Ministers Council, Statistics Working Group (Australia).
Barnes, M., Bauld, L., Benzeval, M., Judge, K., Mackenzie, M., & Sullivan, H. (2005). Health Action Zones. Partnerships for health equity. Abingdon: Routledge.
Bauld, L., Mackinnon, J., & Judge, K. (2001). Community health initiatives: recent policy developments and the emerging evidence base. London: Neighbourhood Renewal Unit, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
Belfiore, E. (2002). Art as a means towards alleviating social exclusion: does it really work? – A critique of instrumental cultural policies and social impact studies in the UK. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 8:1, 91-106.
Belfiore, E. (2006). The social impacts of the arts – myth or reality? In Mirza, M. (ed) Culture Vultures: Is UK arts policy damaging the arts?. London: Policy Exchange. 20-37.
Belfiore, E. & Bennett, O. (2006). Rethinking the social impact of the arts: a critical-historical review. Research paper No. 9. Warwick: Centre for Cultural Policy Studies, University of Warwick.
Belfiore, E. & Bennett, O. (2007). Determinants of impact: towards a better understanding of encounters with the arts. Cultural Trends, 16, 225-275.
Bhaskar, R. (1975). A realist theory of science. Leeds: Leeds Books.
Bickman, L. (1987). The functions of program theory. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 33, Spring, 5-18.
Blackman, T., Greene, A., Hunter, D. J., McKee, L., Elliott, E., Harrington, B. et al. (2006). Performance assessment and wicked problems: the case of health inequalities. Public policy and administration, 21, 66-80.
Blake Stevenson Limited (2000). The role of the arts in regeneration. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Central Research Unit.
Blamey, A. & Mackenzie, M. (2007). Theories of Change and Realistic Evaluation: Peas in a Pod or Apples and Oranges? Evaluation, 13, 439-455.
Britten, N., Campbell, R., Pope, C., Donovan, J., Morgan, M., & Pill, R. (2002). Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 7, 209-215.
Brown, S. (2005). How can research inform ideas of good practice in teaching? The contribution of some official initiatives in the UK. Cambridge Journal of Education 35:3, 383-405.
Burns Owen Partnership (2005). New directions in social policy: developing the evidence base for museums, libraries and archives in England. London: Museums Libraries Archives Council.
Burton, P., Goodlad, R., & Croft, J. (2006). How would we know what works?: Context and complexity in the evaluation of community involvement. Evaluation, 12, 294-312.
Chen, H. T. (1990). Theory-Driven Evaluations. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Coalter, F. (2001). Realising the potential of cultural services: the case for the arts. Research briefing twelve point four3 London: Local Government Association.
Connell, J. P. & Kubisch, A. C. (1998). Applying a theory of change approach to the evaluation of comprehensive community initiatives: progress, prospects and problems. In K.Fulbright-Anderson, A. C.
Kubisch, & J. P. Connell (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives, Vol 2: theory, measurement and analysis. Online: The Aspen Institute. Retrieved 27 April 2007 from http://www.aspeninstitute.org
Cook, T. D. (2000). The false choice between theory-based evaluation and experimentation. New Directions for Evaluation, 87, 27-34.
Corden, A. & Sainsbury, R. (2006). Using verbatim quotations in reporting qualitative social research: researchers' views. York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
Cowling, J. (2004). For Art's Sake? Society and the arts in the 21st century. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
Cultural Initiatives Silicon Valley (2003) Creative community index: measuring progress toward a vibrant Silicon Valley. Silicon Valley: Cultural Initiatives Silicon Valley.
Davidson, E. J. (2000). Ascertaining causality in theory-based evaluation. New Directions in Evaluation, 87, 17-26.
Davies, H., Nutley, S., & Smith, P. (2000). What works? Evidence-based policy and practice in public services. Bristol: Policy Press.
Evans, G. & Shaw, P. (2004). The contribution of culture to regeneration in the UK: a review of evidence. London: Department of Culture Media and Sport.
Evans, G. (2005). Measure for Measure: Evaluating the Evidence of Culture's Contribution to Regeneration. Urban Studies, 42, 959-983.
Fulbright-Anderson, K., Kubisch, A. C., & Connell, J. P. (1998). New approaches to evaluating community initiatives, Vol.2: theory, measurement and analysis. online: The Aspen Institute. Retrieved 27 April 2007 from http://www.aspeninstitute.org
Galloway, S. (2006). Well-being and quality of life: measuring the benefits of culture and sport. A literature review. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
Goodlad, R., Hamilton, C., & Taylor, P. D. (2002a). Not just a treat: arts and social inclusion. A report to the Scottish Arts Council. Edinburgh: Scottish Arts Council.
Goodlad, R., Hamilton, C., & Taylor, P. D. (2002b). "Not just a treat": issues in evaluating arts programmes to secure social inclusion. UK Evaluation Society Conference, 'The art of evaluation: artistry, discipline and delivery', London, 12-13 December, 2002. Online: UK Evaluation Society. Retrieved 11 June 2007 from http://www.evaluation.org.uk/conference/Conf%20presentations%202002/Goodlad%20Hamilton%20&%20Taylor.pdf
Granger, R. C. (1998). Establishing causality in evaluations of comprehensive community initiatives. In K.Fulbright-Anderson, A. C. Kubisch, & J. P. Connell (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives, Vol 2: theory, measurement and analysis. (pp. not numbered). Online: The Aspen Institute. Retrieved 27 April 2007 from http://www.aspeninstitute.org
Guetzkow, J. (2002). How the arts impact communities: an introduction to the literature on arts impact studies. Working Paper Series 20. Princeton: Princeton University Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies.
Hamilton, C. & Scullion, A. (2006). Quality of life and wellbeing. Measuring the benefits of culture and sport: a thinkpiece. Online: Scottish Executive.
Hammond, S. A. & Royal, C. (2001). Lessons from the field: applying appreciative enquiry. Bend, Oregon: Think Book Publishing.
Hargreaves, D. J., MacDonald, R. A. R., & Miell, D. (2005). How do people communicate using music? In Miell, D., MacDonald, R.A.R. and Hargreaves, D.J., Musical Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (pp. 1-26).
Harper, G. & Chitty, C. (2005). The impact of corrections on re-offending:a review of 'what works.' London: Home Office.
Harre, R. (1972). The philosophies of science: an introductory survey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hillage, J., Pearson, R., Anderson, A., & Tamkin, P. (1998). Excellence in research on schools. London: Department for Education and Employment.
Hughes, J. (2004). Doing the arts justice. A review of research literature, practice and theory. Online: The Unit for the Arts and Offenders, Centre for Applied Theatre Research.
Jackson, M.-R. (1998). Arts and culture indicators in community building: project update.
Journal of Arts Management, Law and Society 28[3], 201-203.
Jackson, M.-R., Herranz, J. Jr., & Kabwasa-Green, F. (2003). Art and Culture in Communities: A Framework for Measurement. Policy Brief No.1 of the Culture, Creativity, and Communities Program. Washington DC: The Urban Institute.
Jackson, M. R., Kabwasa-Green, F., & Herranz, J. (2006). Cultural vitality in communities:interpretation and indicators. Washington DC: The Urban Institute.
Jermyn, H. (2001). The arts and social exclusion: a review prepared for the Arts Council of England. London: Arts Council England.
Jermyn, H. (2004). The art of inclusion. Research Report 35. London: Arts Council England.
Judge, K. & Mackenzie, M. (2002). Theory based evaluation: new approaches to evaluating complex community-based initiatives. In J.Mackenbach & M. Bakker (Eds.), Reducing inequalities in health: a European perspective. (pp. 300-312). London: Routledge
Kilroy, A., Garner, C., Parkinson, C., Kagan, C., & Senior, P. (2007a). Invest to save: arts in health evaluation. Exploring the impact of creativity, culture and the arts on health and well being. Manchester: Arts for Health at Manchester Metropolitan University.
Kilroy, A., Garner, C., Parkinson, C., Kagan, C., & Senior, P. (2007b). Towards transformation: Exploring the impact of culture, creativity and the arts on health and wellbeing. A consultation report for the critical friends event September 2007. Manchester: Arts for Health at Manchester Metropolitan University.
Landry, C., Bianchini, F., Maguire, M., & Worpole, K. (1993). The social impact of the arts. A discussion document. Stroud, Gloucestershire: Comedia.
Landry, C., Bianchini, F., Henry, I., & Brookes, F. (2004). Culture and regeneration: an evaluation of the evidence Culture East Midlands.
Mackenzie, M. & Benzeval, M. (2005). Evaluating policy and practice. Designing the national HAZ evaluation. In M.Barnes, L. Bauld, M. Benzeval, K. Judge, M. Mackenzie, & H. Sullivan (Eds.), Health Action Zones. Partnerships for Health Equity. (pp. 43-66). Abingdon: Routledge.
Macnaughton, J., White, M., & Stacy, R. (2005). Researching the benefits of arts in health. Health Education, 105, 332-339.
Martin, S. and Sanderson, I. (1999) Evaluating public policy experiments: measuring outcomes; monitoring processes or managing pilots? Evaluation, 5:3, 245-258.
Matarasso, F. (1996). Defining Values. Evaluation in the arts. Stroud: Comedia.
Matarasso, F. (1997). Use or ornament? The social impact of participation in the arts. Stroud, Gloucestershire: Comedia.
May, C. (2006). Health technology assessment and the politics of evidence. Sociology of Health and Illness, 28, 513-532.
McDonnell, B. & Shellard, D. (2006). Social impact of study of UK theatre London: Arts Council England.
Merli, P. (2002). Evaluating the social impact of participation in arts activities. A critical review of Francois Matarasso's Use or Ornament? International Journal of Cultural Policy, 8, 107-118.
Michalos, A. C. (2005). Arts and the quality of life: an exploratory study. Social Indicators Research, 71, 11-59.
Miell, D., MacDonald, R.A.R. and Hargreaves, D.J. (2005). Musical Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miles, A. & Clarke, R. (2006). The arts in criminal justice - a study of research feasibility Manchester: Centre for Research on Socio Economic Change, University of Manchester. Retrieved 7 August 2007 from http://www.culture.gov.uk/reference_library/publications/3559.aspx
Millward, L., Kelly, M., & Nutbeam, D. (2003). Public health intervention research - the evidence London: Health Development Agency.
Moriarty, G. (1997). Taliruni's Travellers: An arts worker's view of evaluation. The social impact of the arts, Working Paper 7. Stroud: Comedia.
Newman, T., Curtis, K., & Stephens, J. (2003). Do community-based arts projects result in social gains? A review of the literature. Community Development Journal, 38, 310-322.
Oakley, K. (2004). Developing the evidence base for support of cultural and creative activities in South East England. Guildford: South East England Cultural Consortium.
Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-based policy: a realist perspective. London: Sage Publications.
Pawson, R. & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London, California, New Delhi: Sage Publications Ltd.
Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2004). Realist synthesis: an introduction. Methods Paper for the ESRC Research Methods Programme. Online: ESRC Research Methods Programme.
Petticrew, M. & Roberts, H. (2005). Systematic reviews in the social sciences. (1 ed.) Oxford: Blackwell.
Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Reeves, M. (2002). Measuring the economic and social impact of the arts: a review London: Arts Council England.
Rogers, P., Petrosino, A., Huebner, T. A., & Hacsi, T. A. (2000). Program theory evaluation: practice, promise, and problems. New Directions for Evaluation, 87, 5-13.
Ruiz, J. (2004). A literature review of the evidence base for culture, the arts and sport policy. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
Rychetnik, L., Frommer, M., Hawe, P., & Shiell, A. (2002). Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56, 119-127.
Sanderson, I. (2000). Evaluation in complex policy systems. Evaluation, 6, 433-454.
Sanderson, I. (2002). Making Sense of 'What Works': Evidence Based Policy Making as Instrumental Rationality? Public policy and administration, 17, 61-75.
Sayer, A. (1984). Method in social science: a realist approach. London, New York: Routledge.
Selwood, S. (2006). A PART TO PLAY? International Journal of Cultural Policy, 12, 35-53.
Shaw, P. (1999). The arts and neighbourhood renewal. A literature review to inform the work of the Policy Action Team 10. London: DCMS.
Shipman, M. (1997). The limitations of social research. (4 ed.) Harlow, Essex: Addison Wesley Longman.
Spandler, H., Secker, J., Kent, L., Hacking, S., & Shenton, J. (2007). Catching life: the contribution of arts initiatives to recovery approaches in mental health. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 14, 791-799.
Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., & Dillon, L. (2003). Quality in qualitative evaluation: a framework for assessing research evidence. A quality framework. London: Government Chief Social Researcher's Office.
Staricoff, R. L. (2004). Arts in health: a review of the medical literature. Research Report 36. London: Arts Council England.
Thomas, J., Harden, A., Oakley, A., Oliver, S., Sutcliffe, K., Rees, R. et al. (2004). Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 328, 1010-1012.
Thomson, H., Atkinson, R., Petticrew, M., & Kearns, A. (2006). Do urban regeneration programmes improve public health and reduce health inequalities? A synthesis of the evidence from UK policy and practice (1980-2004). Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 108-115.
Tooley, J. & Darby, D. (1998). Education research: a critique. A survey of published educational research. London: Office for Standards in Education.
Weiss, C. H. (2000). Which links in which theories shall we evaluate? New Directions for Evaluation, 87, 35-45.
Weiss, C. H. (1998). Have we learned anything new about the use of evaluation? American Journal of Evaluation, 19:1, 21-33.
Weiss, C.H. (1997). Theory-based evaluation: past, present and future. New Directions for Evaluation, 76, 41-55.
Weiss, C.H. (1972). Evaluation Research. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
White, T. R. & Rentschler, R. (2006). Towards a new understanding of the social impact of the arts. Paper presented to the International Conference on the Arts in Society, 15 - 18 August, 2006, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
White, M. & Angus, J. (2003). Arts and Mental Health Literature Review. Addressing the evidence base from participation in arts and cultural activities. Durham: Centre for Arts and Humanities in Health and Medicine (CAHHM).
White, M. (2004). Arts in mental health for social inclusion: towards a framework for programme evaluation. In Cowling, J. (Ed.), For Art's Sake?: Society and the Arts in the 21st Century (pp. 75-99). London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
Winner, E. & Hetland, L. (2000). The Arts in Education: Evaluating the Evidence for a Causal Link. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34, 3-10.
Winner, E. & Cooper, M. (2000). Mute Those Claims: No Evidence (Yet) for a Causal Link between Arts Study and Academic Achievement. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34, 11-75.
Wykes, T. (2004). What kind of mental health research should we be doing in the 21st century? - Mental health research networks. Journal of mental health, 13, 5-9.
Altmetric
Altmetric