Making teachers in Britain: professional knowledge for initial teacher education in England and Scotland

Menter, I., Brisard, E. and Smith, I. (2006) Making teachers in Britain: professional knowledge for initial teacher education in England and Scotland. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(3), pp. 269-286. (doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2006.00194.x)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

There is an apparent contradiction between the widespread moves towards a uniform and instrumentalist standards-based approach to teaching on the one hand and recent research based insights into the complexity of effective pedagogies. The former tendency reflects a politically driven agenda, the latter is more professionally driven. Tensions reflecting such a contradiction are evident in the debates over initial teacher education (ITE) policy and practice in many parts of the world. This article examines aspects of ITE policy in two contiguous parts of the United Kingdom, England and Scotland. The authors draw on a comparative study carried out during 2002–2004, particularly on an analysis of key contemporary policy documents, in order to consider some of the similarities and differences that are apparent in thestwo countries. It is argued that while features of national culture, tradition and institutional politics have a significant role to play in the detail of the approaches taken, there is nevertheless evidence of significant convergence between both countries in one aspect of the determination of initial teacher education, the definition of teaching through the prescription of standards, which set official parameters on professional knowledge required for entry into the profession. This, it is suggested, reflects trends associated with neoliberal

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Menter, Prof Ian
Authors: Menter, I., Brisard, E., and Smith, I.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Education > Pedagogy Policy and Practice
Journal Name:Educational Philosophy and Theory
ISSN:14690-5812
Published Online:30 May 2006

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record