Value judgments and criminalization

Millie, A. (2011) Value judgments and criminalization. British Journal of Criminology, 51(2), pp. 278-295. (doi: 10.1093/bjc/azr009)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

Fuelled by contemporary concerns of risk and majoritarian calls to adhere to ‘the values the majority hold dear’ there can be said to be a ‘crisis of criminalization’ in liberal democracies. Whilst criminalization is clearly an important theme in criminology there has been little attention on the value judgments behind processes of criminalization. By drawing on elements of moral philosophy and by applying these ideas to everyday criminalization in Toronto, this article takes a first step towards addressing this omission. The article adopts a pluralist and social constructivist perspective where differential interpretations lead to the same behaviour being celebrated, tolerated or censured, depending on context and power. A model of value judgment and criminalization is offered that includes consideration of moral, prudential, economic and aesthetic judgments. Value consensus is questioned and the political capital required to dictate values is considered.

Item Type:Articles
Keywords:Value judgment; criminalization; moral philosophy; aesthetics; Toronto
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Millie, Dr Andrew
Authors: Millie, A.
Subjects:H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences > Urban Studies
Journal Name:British Journal of Criminology
Publisher:Oxford University Press
ISSN:0007-0955
Published Online:21 January 2011
Copyright Holders:The Author

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record