Marshall, A. (2010) Imperial nostalgia, the liberal lie, and the perils of postmodern counterinsurgency. Small Wars and Insurgencies, 21(2), pp. 233-258. (doi: 10.1080/09592318.2010.481407)
Full text not currently available from Enlighten.
Publisher's URL: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/09592318.asp
Abstract
Since 9/11, counterinsurgency is back in fashion; the 'war on terror' has even been branded a 'global counterinsurgency'. However the context within which counterinsurgency originally arose is critical to understanding the prospects for its present success; the radically changed environment in which it is currently being conducted casts into considerable doubt the validity of the doctrine's application by many national militaries currently 'rediscovering' this school of military thought today. Above all, classical counterinsurgency was a profoundly imperial, state-centric phenomenon; consequently it only rarely faced the thorny issue of sovereignty and legitimacy which bedevils and may doom these same efforts today.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Marshall, Dr Alexander |
Authors: | Marshall, A. |
Subjects: | U Military Science > U Military Science (General) D History General and Old World > D History (General) |
College/School: | College of Arts & Humanities > School of Humanities > History |
Journal Name: | Small Wars and Insurgencies |
ISSN: | 0959-2318 |
ISSN (Online): | 1743-9558 |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record