A treadmill control protocol combining nonlinear, equally smooth increases in speed and gradient: Exercise testing for subjects with gait and exercise limitations

Jamieson, L., Hunt, K. and Allan, D. (2008) A treadmill control protocol combining nonlinear, equally smooth increases in speed and gradient: Exercise testing for subjects with gait and exercise limitations. Medical Engineering and Physics, 30(6), pp. 747-754. (doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.08.003)

Abstract

Incremental exercise testing with a linear increase in work rate is the recommended method for clinical exercise testing. A recent protocol (A), incorporating a linear increase in speed and a nonlinear increase in gradient, has been developed which addresses some limitations of traditional testing methods. It does not account for those with an impaired gait pattern. We propose and assess a novel protocol (B) incorporating nonlinear increases in both speed and gradient. We theoretically develop a new treadmill control protocol (B), determine oxygen uptake response linearity, initial metabolic rate and cardiopulmonary response parameters (peak oxygen uptake, lactate threshold, dynamic 0, cost) and compare the outcome measures with two previously verified IET protocols (A and C (constant speed with linear increase in gradient)). Feasibility and outcomes were explored with a subject with incomplete spinal cord injury. The average initial metabolic rate (VO2) was substantially lower during protocol A (0.49 (+/- 0.12) 1 min(-1)) and protocol B (0.52 (+/- 0.05) 1 min(-1)) than during protocol C (1.35 (+/- 0.04) 1 min(-1)). The average linearity of the VO2 response during protocols A and B (correlation co-efficients 0.97 (+/- 0.00) and 0.95 (+/- 0.02), and co-efficients of determination 0.94 (+/- 0.01) and 0.91 (+/- 0.02), respectively) were higher than during protocol C (correlation co-efficient 0.91 (+/- 0.02) and co-efficient of determination 0.84 (+/- 0.02)). The average dynamic O-2 cost for protocol C (6.53 (+/- 0.46) ml min(-1) W-1) was lower than that of protocol A (10.02 (+/- 1.16) ml min(-1) W-1) and protocol B (10.03 (+/- 0.91) ml min(-1) W-1). No differences were found in these parameters between protocols A and B. The new protocol B performs better than protocol C and is comparable with protocol A. When testing subjects with an impaired gait pattern, it may be advantageous to use the new protocol B due to the gradual increases in both speed and gradient throughout the test.

• Item Type: Articles
• Status: Published
• Refereed: Yes
• Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: Hunt, Prof Kenneth
• Authors: Jamieson, L., Hunt, K., and Allan, D.
• College/School: College of Science and Engineering > School of Engineering > Systems Power and Energy
• Journal Name: Medical Engineering and Physics
• Publisher: Elsevier Science
• ISSN: 1350-4533