To what extent are psychological variables considered in the study of risk and protective factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviours in individuals with cancer? A systematic review of 70 years of research

Ernst, M., Schwinn, T., Hirschmiller, J., Cleare, S. , Robb, K. A. , Brähler, E., Zwerenz, R., Wiltink, J., O'Connor, R. C. and Beutel, M. E. (2024) To what extent are psychological variables considered in the study of risk and protective factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviours in individuals with cancer? A systematic review of 70 years of research. Clinical Psychology Review, 102413. (doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102413) (Early Online Publication)

[img] Text
322656.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

1MB

Abstract

Psychological variables substantially shape the risk of suicidal thoughts and behaviours (STBs). However, it is unclear to what extent they are considered in individuals with cancer. We synthesized the quantitative research landscape concerning psychological risk/protective factors of STBs in the (psycho-) oncological context. This pre-registered review (PROSPERO-ID CRD42022331484) systematically searched the databases PubMed/Medline, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science (as well as the grey literature and preprints). Risk of bias (RoB) was estimated using the ROBINS-I tool. Of 11,159 retrieved records, 319 studies were eligible for inclusion. Of those, 163 (51.1%) had investigated psychological factors (affective: n = 155; social: n = 65; cognitive: n = 63; personality/individual differences: n = 37; life events: n = 6), in a combined 3,561,741 participants. The most common STBs were suicidal ideation (n = 107) or death wishes (n = 20) rather than behaviour (suicide deaths: n = 26; attempts: n = 14). Most studies had a serious RoB. Thus, a large body of research investigated STBs in cancer patients/survivors, but it rarely aligned with the theoretical or clinical developments in suicide research. We propose a conceptual model of STBs in cancer delineating moderation and mediation effects to advance the integration of the fields, and to future research and practice.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:This work was supported by a grant from the German Cancer Aid for the project TASC (nr. 70,114,431).
Keywords:Cancer, cancer survivorship, psycho-oncology, suicidal ideation, suicide, suicide attempt, suicide prevention.
Status:Early Online Publication
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Robb, Professor Katie and Cleare, Dr Seonaid and Ernst, Ms Mareike and O'Connor, Professor Rory
Creator Roles:
Ernst, M.Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Visualization
Cleare, S.Writing – review and editing
Robb, K.Writing – review and editing
O'Connor, R.Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review and editing
Authors: Ernst, M., Schwinn, T., Hirschmiller, J., Cleare, S., Robb, K. A., Brähler, E., Zwerenz, R., Wiltink, J., O'Connor, R. C., and Beutel, M. E.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Health & Wellbeing > General Practice and Primary Care
Journal Name:Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0272-7358
ISSN (Online):1873-7811
Published Online:11 March 2024
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
First Published:First published in Clinical Psychology Review 2024
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons licence

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record