HTA community perspectives on the use of patient preference information: lessons learned from a survey with members of HTA bodies

Hiligsmann, M. et al. (2024) HTA community perspectives on the use of patient preference information: lessons learned from a survey with members of HTA bodies. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 40(1), e17. (doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000138) (PMID:38439624)

Abstract

This research sought to assess whether and how patient preference (PP) data are currently used within health technology assessment (HTA) bodies and affiliated organizations involved in technology/drug appraisals and assessments. An exploratory survey was developed by the PP Project Subcommittee of the HTA International Patient and Citizen Involvement Interest Group to gain insight into the use, impact, and role of PP data in HTA, as well as the perceived barriers to its incorporation. Forty members of HTA bodies and affiliated organizations from twelve countries completed the online survey. PP data were reported to be formally considered as part of the HTA evidence review process by 82.5 percent of the respondents, while 39.4 percent reported that most of the appraisals and assessments within their organization in the past year had submitted PP data. The leading reason for why PP data were not submitted in most assessments was time/resource constraints followed by lack of clarity on PP data impact. Participants reported that PP data had a moderate level of influence on the deliberative process and outcome of the decision, but a higher level of influence on the decision’s quality. Most (81.8 percent) felt patient advocacy groups should be primarily responsible for generating and submitting this type of evidence. Insights from the survey confirm the use of PP data in HTA but reveal barriers to its broader and more meaningful integration. Encouragingly, participants believe obstacles can be overcome, paving the way for a second phase of research involving in-depth collaborative workshops with HTA representatives.

• Item Type: Articles
• Keywords: Assessment, health technology, patient preferences, patient outcomes.
• Status: Published
• Refereed: Yes
• Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: Germeni, Dr Evi
• Authors: Hiligsmann, M., Liden, B., Beaudart, C., Germeni, E., Hanna, A., Joshi, M., Koola, C., Stein, B., Tonkinson, M., Marshall, D., and Fifer, S.
• College/School: College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Health & Wellbeing > Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment
• Journal Name: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
• Publisher: Cambridge University Press
• ISSN: 0266-4623
• ISSN (Online): 1471-6348
• Copyright Holders: Copyright © The Author(s), 2024
• First Published: First published in International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 40(1):e17
• Publisher Policy: Reproduced under a Creative Commons licence