Population-based cancer incidence and mortality rates and ratios among adults with intellectual disabilities in Scotland

Ward, L.A. et al. (2024) Population-based cancer incidence and mortality rates and ratios among adults with intellectual disabilities in Scotland. medRxiv, (doi: 10.1101/2024.01.18.23300433) (Unpublished)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

Objective: To provide contemporary data on cancer mortality rates within the context of incidence in the population with intellectual disabilities. Methods: Scotland’s 2011 Census was used to identify adults with intellectual disabilities and controls with records linked to the Scottish Cancer Registry and death certificate data (March 2011-December 2019). The control cohort without intellectual disabilities and/or autism were used for indirect standardisation and calculation of Crude Incident Rates/Crude Mortality Rates (CIR/CMR), and age-sex Standardized Incident Rate Ratios/ Standardized Mortality Ratios (SIR/SMR), with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI). Results: Adults with intellectual disabilities were most likely diagnosed cancers of digestive, specifically colorectal (14.2%), lung (9.3%), breast (female 22.9%), body of the uterus (female 9.3%) and male genital organs (male 17.6%). Higher incident cancers included metastatic cancer of unknown primary origin (female SIR=1.70, male SIR=2.08), body of uterus (female SIR=1.63), ovarian (female SIR=1.59), kidney (female SIR=1.85), and testicular (male SIR=2.49). SMRs were higher, regardless of a higher, similar, or lower incidence (female SMR=1.34, male SMR=1.07). Excess mortality risk was found for colorectal (male SMR=1.59), kidney (female SMR=2.85u), female genital organs (ovarian SMR=2.86u, body of uterus SMR=2.11), breast (female SMR=1.58), and metastatic cancer of unknown primary origin (female SMR=2.50u, male SMR=2.84). Conclusions: Adults with intellectual disabilities were more likely to die of cancer than the general population. Reasons for this may include later presentation/diagnosis (so poorer outcomes), poorer treatment/compliance, or both. Accessible public health approaches are important for people with intellectual disabilities, and healthcare professionals need to be aware of the different cancer experiences faced by this population.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Unpublished
Refereed:No
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Hughes, Mrs Laura and Cairns, Professor Deborah and Henderson, Mrs Angela and Dunn, Mrs Kirsty and Robb, Professor Katie and Cooper, Professor Sally-Ann and Ward, Dr Laura and Hanna, Catherine and Fleming, Dr Michael and Truesdale, Dr Maria and Sosenko, Dr Filip and Morrison, Dr Deborah and Smith, Ms Gillian and Conway, Professor David
Authors: Ward, L.A., Cooper, S.-A., Sosenko, F., Morrison, D., Fleming, M., McCowan, C., Robb, K., Hanna, C., Hughes-McCormack, L., Dunn, K., Conway, D., Henderson, A., Smith, G., Truesdale, M., and Cairns, D.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Cancer Sciences
College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Health & Wellbeing > Mental Health and Wellbeing
College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Health & Wellbeing > Public Health
College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing > Dental School
Journal Name:medRxiv

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record