Rodenbiker, K. G. (2024) Looking for gold in mud: Pseudepigraphy and the ancient Christian rhetoric of attribution. Early Christianity, 14(4), pp. 495-511. (doi: 10.1628/ec-2023-0033)
Text
316484.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only until 4 January 2025. 289kB |
Abstract
Pseudepigraphy is a feature, not a bug, of the generation of the New Testament canon. It is argued here that the common production but unfavorable reception of pseudepigraphy in the early centuries of Christianity and the detection and production of pseudepigraphical literature are all facilitated by the principles of ancient authenticity criticism. Even if the concern shown by ecclesiastical writers over the authentic attribution of works incorporated into an authoritative scriptural collection eventually appears to be overtaken by the centrality of apostolic association, pseudepigraphal or not, a rhetoric of anxiety surrounding pseudepigraphy – with much of its vocabulary drawn from classical authenticity criticism – remains a central aspect of the Christian debate over textual authority and canonicity. Pseudepigraphical practices both impede and drive the canonical process, while pseudepigrapha are both produced and detected by skills learned through ancient educational practices.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Additional Information: | This article has received funding from a British Academy/Leverhulme Trust Small Research Grant (SRG21/210779) and from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No 847428). |
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Rodenbiker, Dr Kelsie |
Authors: | Rodenbiker, K. G. |
College/School: | College of Arts & Humanities > School of Critical Studies > Theology and Religious Studies |
Journal Name: | Early Christianity |
Publisher: | Mohr Siebeck |
ISSN: | 1868-7032 |
ISSN (Online): | 1868-8020 |
Copyright Holders: | Copyright: © Mohr Siebeck 2024 |
First Published: | First published in Early Christianity 14(4): 495-511 |
Publisher Policy: | Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record