Not the ‘Fairest Norm of Them All’ but still needed: on Hobson and criticism of the responsibility to protect

Illingworth, R. (2024) Not the ‘Fairest Norm of Them All’ but still needed: on Hobson and criticism of the responsibility to protect. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, (doi: 10.1080/17502977.2024.2304457) (Early Online Publication)

[img] Text
316483.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

1MB

Abstract

The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) – a commitment to prevent and respond to mass atrocity crimes – has often come under fire. In my contribution to this forum, I wish to respond to some points raised by Christopher Hobson’s interesting article titled The Moral Untouchability of the Responsibility to Protect. In doing so, I offer some thoughts about the direction of scholarship on R2P, arguing that, despite its flaws, abandoning the R2P doctrine would do nothing to help confront the persistent reality of mass atrocity violence.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Early Online Publication
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Illingworth, Dr Richard
Authors: Illingworth, R.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences > Politics
Journal Name:Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding
Publisher:Taylor & Francis
ISSN:1750-2977
ISSN (Online):1750-2985
Published Online:16 February 2024
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2024 The Author
First Published:First published in Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 2024
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record