The Acceptability of post-stroke cognitive testing through the lens of the theory of acceptability, a qualitative study

McMahon, D., Dixon, D., Quinn, T. and Gallacher, K. I. (2024) The Acceptability of post-stroke cognitive testing through the lens of the theory of acceptability, a qualitative study. Cerebral Circulation - Cognition and Behavior, 6, 100197. (doi: 10.1016/j.cccb.2023.100197) (PMID:38226361) (PMCID:PMC10788191)

[img] Text
315453.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

2MB

Abstract

Background: Cognitive impairment is common after stroke and screening is recommended. However, there is a lack of evidence on the best way to assess cognition after stroke and a tendency to focus on the clinician rather than stroke survivor. The Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) was developed to better understand the factors that contribute to the acceptability of healthcare interventions from the patient perspective. We aimed to explore the acceptability of post-stroke cognitive assessment from the stroke survivor perspective, using the TFA as a lens. Methods: We analysed interviews conducted with people admitted to hospital after stroke. Inclusion criteria: ≥18 years, able to provide informed consent. Semi-structured interviews were conducted 1–3 weeks after discharge from hospital in the participant's home to explore the experience of cognitive assessment in hospital. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using framework analysis, with a framework underpinned by the TFA. Results: Of the 13 participants interviewed, 8 were male, 6 lived in the most deprived SIMD quintile. Ages were 62–84 years. Five themes were identified that describe the factors that influence acceptability of cognitive screening from the patient perspective: (1) participation motives; (2) trust in health professionals; (3) perceived risks of harm; (4) information provision; (5) burden of testing. Conclusion: Clinical teams should be confident that stroke survivors expect cognitive testing and understand its rational. However, the provision of information and results of cognitive testing should be person-centred.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:David Cargill Trust (David William Traill Cargill Fund, SC012703). The Stroke Association TSA LECT 2017_01.
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Quinn, Professor Terry and Gallacher, Dr Katie and McMahon, Dr David
Creator Roles:
McMahon, D.Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
Quinn, T.Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – review and editing
Gallacher, K.Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
Authors: McMahon, D., Dixon, D., Quinn, T., and Gallacher, K. I.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Health
College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Health & Wellbeing > General Practice and Primary Care
Journal Name:Cerebral Circulation - Cognition and Behavior
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:2666-2450
ISSN (Online):2666-2450
Published Online:22 December 2023
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2023 Published by Elsevier B.V.
First Published:First published in Cerebral Circulation - Cognition and Behavior 6:100197
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons licence

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record