Postnatal growth in small vulnerable newborns: a longitudinal study of 2 million Brazilians using routine register-based linked data

Rocha, A. S. et al. (2024) Postnatal growth in small vulnerable newborns: a longitudinal study of 2 million Brazilians using routine register-based linked data. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 119(2), pp. 444-455. (doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.12.009) (PMID:38128734)

Abstract

Background: Preterm, low–birth weight (LBW) and small-for-gestational age (SGA) newborns have a higher frequency of adverse health outcomes, including linear and ponderal growth impairment. Objective: To describe the growth trajectories and to estimate catch-up growth during the first 5 y of life of small newborns according to 3 vulnerability phenotypes (preterm, LBW, SGA). Methods: Longitudinal study using linked data from the 100 Million Brazilian Cohort baseline, the Brazilian National Live Birth System (SINASC), and the Food and Nutrition Surveillance System (SISVAN) from 2011 to 2017. We estimated the length/height-for-age (L/HAZ) and weight-for-age z-score (WAZ) trajectories from children of 6–59 mo using the linear mixed model for each vulnerable newborn phenotype. Growth velocity for both L/HAZ and WAZ was calculated considering the change (Δ) in the mean z-score between 2 time points. Catch-up growth was defined as a change in z-score > 0.67 at any time during follow-up. Results: We analyzed 2,021,998 live born children and 8,726,599 observations. The prevalence of at least one of the vulnerable phenotypes was 16.7% and 0.6% were simultaneously preterm, LBW, and SGA. For those born at term, all phenotypes had a period of growth recovery from 12 mo. For preterm infants, the onset of L/HAZ growth recovery started later at 24 mo and the growth trajectories appear to be lower than those born at term, a condition aggravated among children with the 3 phenotypes. Preterm and female infants seem to experience slower growth recovery than those born at term and males. The catch-up growth occurs at 24–59 mo for males preterm: preterm + AGA + NBW (Δ = 0.80), preterm + AGA + LBW (Δ = 0.88), and preterm + SGA + LBW (Δ = 1.08); and among females: term + SGA + NBW (Δ = 0.69), term + AGA + LBW (Δ = 0.72), term + SGA + LBW (Δ = 0.77), preterm + AGA + LBW (Δ = 0.68), and preterm + SGA + LBW (Δ = 0.83). Conclusions: Children born preterm seem to reach L/HAZ and WAZ growth trajectories lower than those attained by children born at term, a condition aggravated among the most vulnerable.

• Item Type: Articles
• Additional Information: This study was funded by the Department of Science and Technology (Decit), Ministry of Health (Decentralized Execution Term – TED number 64/2022, process 415 25000.148278/2022-10). CIDACS and the 100 Million cohort received financial support from the Wellcome Trust (grant number 202912/Z/16/Z), the Health Surveillance Secretariat, Ministry of Health, Brazil, Bahia State (TED number 159/2019), the Secretariat of Science and Technology of the State of Bahia (SECTI) (term of assignment of movable property 048/2018, process number 1430150022698). ESP is a fellow supported by the Wellcome Trust (grant number 225925/Z/22/Z). NJS acknowledges support from the grant CEX2018-000806-S funded by MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033 and support from the Generalitat de Catalunya through the CERCA Program.
• Keywords: Growth, low–birth weight newborn, preterm birth, small-for-gestational age.
• Status: Published
• Refereed: Yes
• Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: Anderson, Dr Craig
• Authors: Rocha, A. S., de Cássia Ribeiro-Silva, R., Silva, J. F.M., Pinto, E. J., Silva, N. J., Paixao, E. S., Fiaccone, R. L., Kac, G., Rodrigues, L. C., Anderson, C., and Barreto, M. L.
• College/School: College of Science and Engineering > School of Mathematics and Statistics > Statistics
• Journal Name: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
• Publisher: Elsevier
• ISSN: 0002-9165
• ISSN (Online): 1938-3207
• Published Online: 20 December 2023
• Copyright Holders: Copyright © 2023 The Authors
• First Published: First published in American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 119(2):444-455
• Publisher Policy: Reproduced under a Creative Commons License