Sexual harassment, sexual assault and rape by colleagues in the surgical workforce, and how women and men are living different realities: observational study using NHS population-derived weights

Begeny, C. T., Arshad, H., Cuming, T., Dhariwal, D. K., Fisher, R. A., Franklin, M. D., Jackson, P. M., McLachlan, G. M., Searle, R. H. and Newlands, C. (2023) Sexual harassment, sexual assault and rape by colleagues in the surgical workforce, and how women and men are living different realities: observational study using NHS population-derived weights. British Journal of Surgery, 110(11), pp. 1518-1526. (doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad242) (PMID:37697690) (PMCID:PMC10564399)

Abstract

Background: This observational study, paired with National Health Service (NHS) workforce population data, examined gender differences in surgical workforce members’ experiences with sexual misconduct (sexual harassment, sexual assault, rape) among colleagues in the past 5 years, and their views of the adequacy of accountable organizations in dealing with this issue. Methods: This was a survey of UK surgical workforce members, recruited via surgical organizations. Results: Some 1704 individuals participated, with 1434 (51.5 per cent women) eligible for primary unweighted analyses. Weighted analyses, grounded in NHS England surgical workforce population data, used 756 NHS England participants. Weighted and unweighted analyses showed that, compared with men, women were significantly more likely to report witnessing, and be a target of, sexual misconduct. Among women, 63.3 per cent reported being the target of sexual harassment versus 23.7 per cent of men (89.5 per cent witnessing versus 81.0 per cent of men). Additionally, 29.9 per cent of women had been sexually assaulted versus 6.9 per cent of men (35.9 per cent witnessing versus 17.1 per cent of men), with 10.9 per cent of women experiencing forced physical contact for career opportunities (a form of sexual assault) versus 0.7 per cent of men. Being raped by a colleague was reported by 0.8 per cent of women versus 0.1 per cent of men (1.9 per cent witnessing versus 0.6 per cent of men). Evaluations of organizations’ adequacy in handling sexual misconduct were significantly lower among women than men, ranging from a low of 15.1 per cent for the General Medical Council to a high of 31.1 per cent for the Royal Colleges (men’s evaluations: 48.6 and 60.2 per cent respectively). Conclusion: Sexual misconduct in the past 5 years has been experienced widely, with women affected disproportionately. Accountable organizations are not regarded as dealing adequately with this issue.

• Item Type: Articles
• Status: Published
• Refereed: Yes
• Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: Searle, Professor Rosalind
• Authors: Begeny, C. T., Arshad, H., Cuming, T., Dhariwal, D. K., Fisher, R. A., Franklin, M. D., Jackson, P. M., McLachlan, G. M., Searle, R. H., and Newlands, C.
• College/School: College of Social Sciences > Adam Smith Business School > Management
• Journal Name: British Journal of Surgery
• Publisher: Oxford University Press
• ISSN: 0007-1323
• ISSN (Online): 1365-2168
• Published Online: 12 September 2023
• Copyright Holders: Copyright © The Author(s) 2023.
• First Published: First published in British Journal of Surgery 110(11):1518-1526
• Publisher Policy: Reproduced under a Creative Commons license