Can people value the aesthetic and use services of urban sites? Evidence from a survey of Belfast residents

Alberini, A., Riganti, P. and Longo, A. (2003) Can people value the aesthetic and use services of urban sites? Evidence from a survey of Belfast residents. Journal of Cultural Economics, 27(3/4), pp. 193-213. (doi: 10.1023/A:1026317209968)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

This study explores the potential of conjoint choice experiments for planning decisions on urban sites. We elicit people's preferences for regeneration projects that change the aesthetic and use character of specified urban sites. We use a split-sample design with two sets of regeneration projects. The first entails hypothetical transformations of an actual square with an important cultural and historical dimension. The other consists of hypothetical transformations of an abstract square which we try to make as close as possible to the former in all respects, except for its cultural and historical dimension. Each regeneration project is defined by aesthetic and use attributes. Our results suggest that individual choices are explained by the attributes, and that the marginal utilities are significantly different across projects for the actual and the abstract square.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Riganti, Professor Patrizia
Authors: Alberini, A., Riganti, P., and Longo, A.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Social & Environmental Sustainability
Journal Name:Journal of Cultural Economics
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:0885-2545
ISSN (Online):1573-6997

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record