Coderre-LaPalme, G., Greer, I. and Schulte, L. (2023) Welfare, work and the conditions of social solidarity: British campaigns to defend healthcare and social security. Work, Employment and Society, 37(2), pp. 352-372. (doi: 10.1177/09500170211031454) (PMID:37069965) (PMCID:PMC10102913)
Text
307942.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 140kB |
Abstract
When the welfare state is under attack from neoliberal reformers, how can trade unionists and other campaigners build solidarity to defend it? Based on 45 qualitative interviews, this article compares campaigns to defend British health services and social security benefits between 2007 and 2016. Building on the macro-insights of comparative welfare-state literature and the more micro-level insights of studies on mobilisation, community unionism and union strategy, it examines the factors that help or hinder the construction of solidarity. This research finds that building solidarity is more difficult when defending targeted benefits than universal ones, not only because of differences in public opinion and political support for services, but also because the labour process associated with targeting benefits, namely the assessing and sanctioning of clients, can generate conflicts among campaigners.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Coderre-LaPalme, Dr Genevieve |
Authors: | Coderre-LaPalme, G., Greer, I., and Schulte, L. |
College/School: | College of Social Sciences > Adam Smith Business School > Management |
Journal Name: | Work, Employment and Society |
Publisher: | SAGE Publications |
ISSN: | 0950-0170 |
ISSN (Online): | 1469-8722 |
Published Online: | 13 August 2021 |
Copyright Holders: | Copyright © 2021 The Author(s) |
First Published: | First published in Work, Employment and Society 37(2):352-372 |
Publisher Policy: | Reproduced under a creative commons licence |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record