Optimal vehicle fleet planning and collaboration under carbon neutrality: a game-theoretic perspective

Xu, S. X., Ning, Y., Cheng, H., Zhang, A. , Gao, Y. and Huang, G. Q. (2023) Optimal vehicle fleet planning and collaboration under carbon neutrality: a game-theoretic perspective. International Journal of Production Research, (doi: 10.1080/00207543.2023.2262053) (Early Online Publication)

[img] Text
307831.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 3 October 2024.

728kB

Abstract

This paper studies the optimal vehicle fleet planning and collaboration problem for two transport service providers and a carbon emission treatment agency under carbon neutrality. One is a provider of transport services deploying commercial electric vehicles (CEVs), and the other is a provider of transport services using fuel vehicles (FVs). Our work is motivated by the recent global emphasis on carbon neutrality. The FV transport service provider pays a fixed fee or a portion of its sales revenue to a carbon emission treatment agency in exchange for technology to reduce its carbon emissions. We formulate a game-theoretic framework among the two transport service providers and a carbon emission treatment agency, in which the FV transport provider can adopt three strategies (i.e., no emission reduction (S1), purchasing technology for emission reduction (S2), and entrusting a carbon emission treatment agency (S3)), resulting in three potential game scenarios. We derive each party’s optimal fleet size, price, and profit in the three scenarios. Furthermore, we expand the model for a company with a blended fleet of CEVs and FVs, and explore the effect of consumer green preference and the purchase cost per CEV on this company’s strategy selection. Our results suggest that carbon emission reduction strategies may improve the market performance of the FV transport service provider. Then, we find no certain strategy is always preferable to another: the optimal cooperation strategy between the transport service provider and carbon emission treatment agency depends on the fixed technology fee, ratio of revenue sharing, government penalty, the transport service market potential, and consumer green preference, as well as the cost per CEV. When the market potential is large enough the carbon emission treatment agency should cooperate with the FV transport service provider through strategy S3. This paper gives the transport service provider and carbon emission treatment agency a full picture of whether, when, and how to collaborate in green commerce.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 72071093, 72171023 and 71971142, the RGC TRS Project (T32-707-22-N), the Philosophy and Social Sciences Planning Project of Guangdong Province under Grant GD22XGL62, and the 2019 Guangdong Special Support Talent Program–Innovation and Entrepreneurship Leading Team (China) under Grant 2019BT 02S593.
Status:Early Online Publication
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Zhang, Dr Abraham
Authors: Xu, S. X., Ning, Y., Cheng, H., Zhang, A., Gao, Y., and Huang, G. Q.
Subjects:H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
College/School:College of Social Sciences > Adam Smith Business School > Management
Journal Name:International Journal of Production Research
Publisher:Taylor and Francis Group
ISSN:0020-7543
ISSN (Online):1366-588X
Published Online:03 October 2023
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
First Published:First published in International Journal of Production Research 2023
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record