Institutional logic meets global imagining: Kazakhstan’s engagement with China’s Belt and Road Initiative

Lee, J. T. , Lo, W. Y. W. and Abdrasheva, D. (2021) Institutional logic meets global imagining: Kazakhstan’s engagement with China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Higher Education, 82(2), pp. 237-253. (doi: 10.1007/s10734-020-00634-y)

[img] Text
307290.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

724kB

Abstract

Theoretical ideas about globalization and internationalization of higher education emphasize the tension among different ideologies of higher education. According to literature, a competition among states, economy, knowledge, and status generates this tension to drive higher education development. This theoretical understanding not only shapes our global imaginations but also permeates the organizational behavior of universities. In this paper, we focus on the institutional logics that motivate universities in Kazakhstan to engage with China’s ambitious Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). We investigate the ways that Kazakhstani higher education interprets and responds to China’s vision of a global order. Based on interviews conducted at 10 higher education institutions (HEIs) in Kazakhstan, we argue that Kazakhstan’s engagement with the BRI circumvents the cultural connectivity and global cooperation that are embraced by Chinese policy discourse and perpetuated by academic literature. Rather, institutional leaders in Kazakhstan operate with a utilitarian logic that seeks revenue generation, links with industry, and opportunities for students in employment and further education. The pursuit of these strategic outcomes demonstrates a bilateral engagement with China rather than the multilateral cooperation envisioned by policymakers. In a higher education system dominated by the state, the institutions in our study exhibit partial agency to accrue pragmatic benefits rather than concede to isomorphic pressures or mimic internationalization from neoliberal contexts. The discrepancy between policy discourse from China and policy reception in Kazakhstan raises questions about the rhetoric of a multipolar global order and the realities of international cooperation in higher education.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:Funding: This study was funded by the Education University of Hong Kong (project number (RG96/16-17R).
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Lee, Dr Jack
Authors: Lee, J. T., Lo, W. Y. W., and Abdrasheva, D.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Education
Journal Name:Higher Education
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:0018-1560
ISSN (Online):1573-174X
Published Online:03 November 2020
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2020 The Authors
First Published:First published in Higher Education 82:237-253
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons licence

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record