Acetobacter pomorum in the Drosophila gut microbiota buffers against host metabolic impacts of dietary preservative formula and batch variation in dietary yeast

Sannino, D. R. and Dobson, A. J. (2023) Acetobacter pomorum in the Drosophila gut microbiota buffers against host metabolic impacts of dietary preservative formula and batch variation in dietary yeast. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 89(10), e0016523. (doi: 10.1128/aem.00165-23) (PMID:37800920) (PMCID:PMC10617557)

[img] Text
306841.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

1MB

Abstract

Gut microbiota are fundamentally important for healthy function in animal hosts. Drosophila melanogaster is a powerful system for understanding host-microbiota interactions, with modulation of the microbiota inducing phenotypic changes that are conserved across animal taxa. Qualitative differences in diet, such as preservatives and dietary yeast batch variation, may affect fly health indirectly via microbiota, and may potentially have hitherto uncharacterized effects directly on the fly. These factors are rarely considered, controlled, and are not standardized among laboratories. Here, we show that the microbiota’s impact on fly triacylglyceride (TAG) levels—a commonly-measured metabolic index—depends on both preservatives and yeast, and combinatorial interactions among the three variables. In studies of conventional, axenic, and gnotobiotic flies, we found that microbial impacts were apparent only on specific yeast-by-preservative conditions, with TAG levels determined by a tripartite interaction of the three experimental factors. When comparing axenic and conventional flies, we found that preservatives caused more variance in host TAG than microbiota status, and certain yeast-preservative combinations even reversed effects of microbiota on TAG. Preservatives had major effects in axenic flies, suggesting either direct effects on the fly or indirect effects via media. However, Acetobacter pomorum buffers the fly against this effect, despite the preservatives inhibiting growth, indicating that this bacterium benefits the host in the face of mutual environmental toxicity. Our results suggest that antimicrobial preservatives have major impacts on host TAG, and that microbiota modulates host TAG dependent on the combination of the dietary factors of preservative formula and yeast batch.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Dobson, Dr Adam and Sannino, Dr David
Authors: Sannino, D. R., and Dobson, A. J.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Molecular Biosciences
Journal Name:Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Publisher:American Society for Microbiology
ISSN:0099-2240
ISSN (Online):1098-5336
Published Online:06 October 2023
Copyright Holders:Copyright © The Authors 2023
First Published:First published in Applied and Environmental Microbiology 89(10):e0016523
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record

Project CodeAward NoProject NamePrincipal InvestigatorFunder's NameFunder RefLead Dept
31681621ROMITIGATIONFUND GlasgowGerard GrahamBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)BB/W510658/1SII - Immunology & Infection
305846Remote control: How do microbiota promote animal health?Adam DobsonMedical Research Council (MRC)MR/S033939/1School of Molecular Biosciences