Judicial biography in the national security constitution: Lord Diplock and a ‘rather silly little secret racket’

Scott, P. F. (2024) Judicial biography in the national security constitution: Lord Diplock and a ‘rather silly little secret racket’. Modern Law Review, 87(3), pp. 604-639. (doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.12856)

[img] Text
306704.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

349kB

Abstract

This article considers the extra-judicial work of Lord Diplock in the domain of national security in the context of his life and judicial work. It first considers briefly the role of judicial biography in understanding the work of judges and then the particular considerations which apply to such biography in the context of national security law and practice. The following sections consider Lord Diplock's role in national security oversight, emphasising the wide range of issues with a national security dimension which Diplock was called upon to consider. It then seeks to shed light on the reasons for which he was repeatedly entrusted by the government to consider matters of the utmost sensitivity by turning back to his early life, his service during the second world war, and his work thereafter.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:Some of the research for this paper was funded by the Glasgow University COVID-19 researcher support scheme, for which I am very grateful.
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Scott, Mr Paul
Authors: Scott, P. F.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Law
Journal Name:Modern Law Review
Publisher:Wiley
ISSN:0026-7961
ISSN (Online):1468-2230
Published Online:21 November 2023
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2023 The Authors
First Published:First published in Modern Law Review 87(3):604-639
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons licence

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record