Swimming coaches’ perceptions of sexual exploitation in sport: a preliminary model of role conflict and role ambiguity

Bringer, J. D., Brackenridge, C. H. and Johnston, L. H. (2006) Swimming coaches’ perceptions of sexual exploitation in sport: a preliminary model of role conflict and role ambiguity. Sport Psychologist, 20(4), pp. 465-479. (doi: 10.1123/tsp.20.4.465)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

Bringer, Brackenridge, and Johnston (2002) identified role conflict and ambiguity as an emerging theme for some swimming coaches who felt under increased scrutiny because of wider concerns about sexual exploitation in sport (Boocock, 2002). To further understand this emerging theme, 3 coaches who had engaged in sexual relations with athletes, or had allegations of abuse brought against them, took part in in-depth interviews. Grounded theory method (Strauss & Corbin, 1998) was adopted to explore how these coaches responded differently to increased public scrutiny. The findings are discussed in relation to how sport psychologists can help to shape perceptions of coaching effectiveness that are congruent with child protection measures. Reflective practice is proposed as one method by which coaches may embed child and athlete protection in their definition of effective coaching, rather than seeing it as an external force to which they must accommodate.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Johnston, Dr Lynne
Authors: Bringer, J. D., Brackenridge, C. H., and Johnston, L. H.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Health & Wellbeing > General Practice and Primary Care
Journal Name:Sport Psychologist
Publisher:Human Kinetics
ISSN:0888-4781
ISSN (Online):1543-2793

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record