Adolescents’ perspectives on a school-based physical activity intervention: a mixed method study

Jong, S. T. et al. (2020) Adolescents’ perspectives on a school-based physical activity intervention: a mixed method study. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 9(1), pp. 28-40. (doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2019.06.007) (PMID:31921478) (PMCID:PMC6943775)

[img] Text
303045.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

464kB

Abstract

Purpose To examine adolescent experiences and perspectives of the GoActive intervention (ISRCTN31583496) using mixed methods process evaluation to determine satisfaction with intervention components and interpret adolescents’ experiences of the intervention process in order to provide insights for future intervention design. Methods Participants (n = 1542; 13.2 ±  0.4 years, mean ± SD) provided questionnaire data at baseline (shyness, activity level) and post-intervention (intervention acceptability, satisfaction with components). Between-group differences (boys vs. girls and shy/inactive vs. others) were tested with linear regression models, accounting for school clustering. Data from 16 individual interviews (shy/inactive) and 11 focus groups with 48 participants (mean = 4; range 2–7) were thematically coded. Qualitative and quantitative data were merged in an integrative mixed methods convergence matrix, which denoted convergence and dissonance across datasets. Results Effect sizes for quantitative results were small and may not represent substantial between-group differences. Boys (vs. girls) preferred class-based sessions (β = 0.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.1–0.3); qualitative data suggested that this was because boys preferred competition, which was supported quantitatively (β = 0.2, 95%CI: 0.1–0.3). Shy/inactive students did not enjoy the competition (β = –0.3, 95%CI: –0.5 to –0.1). Boys enjoyed trying new activities more (β = 0.1, 95%CI: 0.1–0.2); qualitative data indicated a desire to try new activities across all subgroups but identified barriers to choosing unfamiliar activities with self-imposed choice restriction leading to boredom. Qualitative data highlighted critique of mentorship; adolescents liked the idea, but older mentors did not meet expectations. Conclusion We interpreted adolescent perspectives of intervention components and implementation to provide insights into future complex interventions aimed at increasing young people's physical activity in school-based settings. The intervention component mentorship was liked in principle, but implementation issues undesirably impacted satisfaction; competition was disliked by girls and shy/inactive students. The results highlight the importance of considering gender differences in preference of competition and extensive mentorship training.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:This study is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research Programme (13/90/18). This work was additionally supported by the Medical Research Council (Unit Program number MC_UU_12015/7) and was undertaken under the auspices of the Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), a UKCRC Public Health Research Centre of Excellence. Funding from the British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Economic and Social Research Council, Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health Research, and Wellcome Trust, under the auspices of the UK Clinical Research Collaboration, is gratefully acknowledged (087636/Z/08/Z; ES/G007462/1; MR/K023187/1).
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Lawlor, Dr Emma
Authors: Jong, S. T., Croxson, C. H.D., Guell, C., Lawlor, E. R., Foubister, C., Brown, H. E., Wells, E. K., Wilkinson, P., Vignoles, A., van Sluijs, E. M.F., and Corder, K.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Health
Journal Name:Journal of Sport and Health Science
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:2095-2546
ISSN (Online):2213-2961
Published Online:20 June 2019
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Shanghai University of Sport
First Published:First published in Journal of Sport and Health Science 9(1):28-40
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons licence

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record