Bumble bee pollination and the wildflower/crop trade-off: When do wildflower enhancements improve crop yield?

Carturan, B. S., Siewe, N., Cobbold, C. A. and Tyson, R. C. (2023) Bumble bee pollination and the wildflower/crop trade-off: When do wildflower enhancements improve crop yield? Ecological Modelling, 484, 110447. (doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110447)

Abstract

Populations of wild insect pollinators such as bumble bees are threatened worldwide, which compromises pollinator-dependent crop yields. Intentionally planting wildflower patches in agricultural landscapes can support these populations and increase the pollination of nearby crops via the “spillover effect” (i.e., the exporter hypothesis), but may also distract bees from the crops and reduce their pollination via the “Circe principle” (i.e., the aggregation hypothesis). Considering the potentially high costs of these management strategies and the necessity to support wild insect pollinators in the Anthropocene, there is a pressing need to provide simulation tools that can inform best practices for wildflower plantings in agro-ecosystems. We developed a spatially implicit ordinary differential equations (ODEs) model specifically designed to determine the optimal wildflower-to-crop ratio as a function of wildflower patch (i) attractiveness, (ii) nutritional benefits, and (iii) blooming period relative to the crop. The model represents the population dynamics of a bumble bee colony and floral resources (crop and wildflower) in the landscape and nest during one harvesting season. We conduct a full factorial simulation experiment to identify the optimal characteristics of the wildflower patch (i.e., blooming period, attractiveness, relative abundance) that maximise crop yield via the enhancement of the number of bees pollinating crop flowers in a fictional blueberry farm. Our results suggest that providing highly attractive and nutritive wildflower resources before and not during the crop blooming season is the most beneficial strategy. When both flower types are in competition, pollination services can decrease, either when wildflowers are too attractive, or if they provide less benefits to the bees than the crop due to a trade-off between resources quality versus quantity.

• Item Type: Articles
• Additional Information: This work was funded by (RCT) NSERC grants RGPIN-2016-05277, RGPIN-2022-03589, and STPGP 506922-17. RCT and BSC would like to acknowledge the support of the Institute for Biodiversity, Resilience, and Ecosystem Services at UBC Okanagan. Part of this work was carried out while CAC was a funded visiting scholar at the Fields Institute for Research in Mathematical Sciences.
• Status: Published
• Refereed: Yes
• Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: Cobbold, Professor Christina

Creator Roles

Cobbold, C.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review and editing, Funding acquisition

• Authors: Carturan, B. S., Siewe, N., Cobbold, C. A., and Tyson, R. C.
• College/School: College of Science and Engineering > School of Mathematics and Statistics > Mathematics
• Journal Name: Ecological Modelling
• Publisher: Elsevier
• ISSN: 0304-3800
• ISSN (Online): 1872-7026
• Published Online: 31 July 2023
• Copyright Holders: Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V.
• First Published: First published in Ecological Modelling 484:110447
• Publisher Policy: Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy