Consequences of grouped data for testing for departure from circular uniformity

Humphreys, R. K. and Ruxton, G. D. (2017) Consequences of grouped data for testing for departure from circular uniformity. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 71(11), 167. (doi: 10.1007/s00265-017-2393-2) (PMID:29142337) (PMCID:PMC5660840)

[img] Text
301383.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

516kB

Abstract

Limits to the precision of circular data often cause grouping of data points into discrete categories, but the effects of grouping on tests for circular uniformity have been little explored. The Rayleigh test is often applied to grouped circular data, despite it being designed for continuous data and the statistical literature recommending a suite of alternative tests specifically designed for grouped data. Here, we investigated the performance of the Rayleigh test relative to four alternatives for testing the null hypothesis of uniformity in grouped circular data. We employed simulation, grouping data into a discrete number of same-sized categories and with samples drawn from a range of different distributions. We found that grouping had little effect on the type I error rate or the power of the Rayleigh test, and that the power of the Rayleigh test was very similar to that of the previously recommended alternative tests designed specifically for grouped circular data. It may thus be appropriate to apply the Rayleigh test to grouped data, provided the situation is one in which the test has substantial statistical power.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:McKenna, Dr Rosalind and Ruxton, Professor Graeme
Authors: Humphreys, R. K., and Ruxton, G. D.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Biodiversity, One Health & Veterinary Medicine
University Services > Learning and Teaching Services Division
Journal Name:Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:0340-5443
ISSN (Online):1432-0762
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2017 The Author(s)
First Published:First published in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 71(11):167
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons licence

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record