Post-dropping behavior of potato aphids (Macrosiphum euphorbiae)

Humphreys, R. K. , Ruxton, G. D. and Karley, A. J. (2021) Post-dropping behavior of potato aphids (Macrosiphum euphorbiae). Journal of Insect Behavior, 34(4), pp. 223-239. (doi: 10.1007/s10905-021-09784-y)

[img] Text
301370.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

837kB

Abstract

Dropping behavior is an effective antipredator defense utilized by many insects including aphids, which drop from plants to lower plant parts or underlying substrates to avoid attack from predatory invertebrates. While research commonly focusses on triggers of dropping, less attention is given to what happens to prey individuals following escape drops. In this study, the duration of tonic immobility, recovery rates, and cases of “instant recovery” (re-clinging to lower plant parts) exhibited by potato aphids (Macrosiphum euphorbiae) that dropped from potted seedlings in response to introduced ladybird (Adalia bipunctata) adults, lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea) larvae, and a standardized tactile stimulus were investigated in relation to a range of environmental factors. Air temperature had a negative correlation with the duration of post-dropping tonic immobility; as temperature increased, time spent motionless decreased. Aphids also showed a pattern of increased recovery rate at higher temperatures. Aphids may be selected to move off the substrate quicker to avoid risks of overheating/desiccation at higher temperatures; and/or higher body temperature facilitates locomotion. Stimulus type also influenced recovery rate back to the original seedling, with aphids generally recovering after the standardized stimulus quicker than after dropping triggered by a real predator. Considering cases of instant recovery onto lower-reaches of the host seedling, seedling height influenced the likelihood of re-clinging, with aphids that managed to instantly recover dropping from, on average, taller seedlings than aphids that dropped to the substrate. Plant architecture could mitigate the costs of dropping for aphids, but further studies quantifying understory foliage cover are needed.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:Funding: Perry Foundation, University of St Andrews, Scottish Government Rural and Environmental Sciences and Analytical Services Division.
Keywords:Aphididae, dropping behaviour, predator-prey interactions, recovery, tonic immobility.
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:McKenna, Dr Rosalind
Authors: Humphreys, R. K., Ruxton, G. D., and Karley, A. J.
College/School:University Services > Learning and Teaching Services Division
Journal Name:Journal of Insect Behavior
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:0892-7553
ISSN (Online):1572-8889
Published Online:25 August 2021
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2021 The Authors
First Published:First published in Journal of Insect Behavior 34(4): 223-239
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record