Pilot study exploring if an augmented reality NeedleTrainer device improves novice performance of a simulated central venous catheter insertion on a phantom

Evans, A., Shevlin, S., Burckett-St.Laurent, D., Bowness, J., Kearns, R. J. and MacFarlane, A. (2023) Pilot study exploring if an augmented reality NeedleTrainer device improves novice performance of a simulated central venous catheter insertion on a phantom. Cureus, 15(6), e40197. (doi: 10.7759/cureus.40197) (PMID:37431346) (PMCID:PMC10329877)

Abstract

Introduction: Needle insertion and visualisation skills needed for ultrasound (US)-guided procedures can be challenging to acquire. The novel NeedleTrainer device superimposes a digital holographic needle on a real-time US image display without puncturing a surface. The aim of this randomised control study was to compare the success of trainees performing a simulated central venous catheter insertion on a phantom either with or without prior NeedleTrainer device practice. Methods: West of Scotland junior trainees who had not performed insertion of a central venous catheter were randomised into two groups (n=20). Participants undertook standardized online training through a pre-recorded video and training on how to handle a US probe. Group 1 had 10 minutes of supervised training with the NeedleTrainer device. Group 2 were a control group. Participants were assessed on needle insertion to a pre-defined target vein in a phantom. The outcome measures were the time taken for needle placement (secs), number of needle passes (n), operator confidence (0-10), assessor confidence (0-10), and NASA task load index score. Results: The mean mental demand score in the control group was 7.65 (SD 3.5) compared to 12.8 (SD 2.2, p=0.005) in the NeedleTrainer group. There was no statistical difference between the groups in any of the other outcome measures. Discussion: This was a small pilot study, and small participant numbers may have impacted the statistical significance. There is natural variation of skill within participants that could not have been controlled for. The difference in pressure needed using the NeedleTrainer compared to a real needle may impact the outcome measures.

• Item Type: Articles
• Status: Published
• Refereed: Yes
• Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: Evans, Dr Annie and MacFarlane, Dr Alan and Kearns, Dr Rachel
• Authors: Evans, A., Shevlin, S., Burckett-St.Laurent, D., Bowness, J., Kearns, R. J., and MacFarlane, A.
• College/School: College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing
• Journal Name: Cureus
• Publisher: Cureus Inc.
• ISSN: 2168-8184
• ISSN (Online): 2168-8184
• Copyright Holders: Copyright © 2023 The Authors
• First Published: First published in Cureus 15(6):e40197
• Publisher Policy: Reproduced under a Creative Commons License