A bibliometric analysis of sustainable product design methods from 1999 to 2022: trends, progress, and disparities between China and the rest of the world

Gao, M., Ma, K., He, R., Vezzoli, C. and Li, N. (2023) A bibliometric analysis of sustainable product design methods from 1999 to 2022: trends, progress, and disparities between China and the rest of the world. Sustainability, 15(16), 12440. (doi: 10.3390/su151612440)

Abstract

Effective product design strategies play a crucial role in promoting sustainable production, consumption, and disposal practices. In the literature, many such practices have been proposed by various researchers; however, it is challenging to understand which is more effective from the design point of view. This study employs bibliometric analysis and visualization software, CiteSpace, to comprehensively assess the literature on sustainable product design methods (SPDMs) from two major citation databases, namely, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Web of Science, covering the period between 1999 and 2022. The objective of this review is to identify the latest research trends, progress, and disparities between China and the rest of the world in the field of SPDMs. The findings reveal that the development of SPDMs is characterized by a combination of multi-method integration and expansion, as well as qualitative and quantitative hybrids. However, research processes differ between China and other countries. Chinese studies focus on digital-driven development, rural revitalization, and system design, while research from other countries emphasizes a circular economy, distribution, additive manufacturing, and artificial intelligence. Nevertheless, both Chinese and international studies lack quantitative research methods in relation to socio-cultural sustainability. Future research should aim to deepen sustainable design methods and standards for specialized products, as well as to incorporate quantitative methods that address cultural and social sustainability dimensions. Open-source and shared SPDMs should be encouraged to promote methodological innovation that prioritizes multidimensional and systematic sustainable benefits, leveraging the strengths of new technologies.

• Item Type: Articles
• Additional Information: This work is supported by a grant from the National Philosophy and Social Science Foundation of China (Grant Number: 20AG011), the National Philosophy and Social Science Foundation of China (Grant Number: 13ZD03), the Hunan Provincial Postgraduate Scientific research innovation project (Grant Number: CX20200425), and the International Learning Network of networks on Sustainability project funded by the EU Erasmus + program for capacity building (www.ec.europa.eu), with 36 universities worldwide as partners.
• Status: Published
• Refereed: Yes
• Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: UNSPECIFIED
• Authors: Gao, M., Ma, K., He, R., Vezzoli, C., and Li, N.
• College/School: College of Science and Engineering
• Journal Name: Sustainability
• Publisher: MDPI
• ISSN: 2071-1050
• ISSN (Online): 2071-1050
• Copyright Holders: Copyright © 2023 by the authors
• First Published: First published in Sustainability 15(16):12440
• Publisher Policy: Reproduced under a Creative Commons licence