Cardiovascular safety in type 2 diabetes with sulfonylureas as second-line drugs: a nation-wide population-based comparative safety study

Wang, H. et al. (2023) Cardiovascular safety in type 2 diabetes with sulfonylureas as second-line drugs: a nation-wide population-based comparative safety study. Diabetes Care, 46(5), pp. 967-977. (doi: 10.2337/dc22-1238) (PMID:36944118) (PMCID:PMC10154665)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the real-world cardiovascular (CV) safety for sulfonylureas (SU), in comparison with dipeptidylpeptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) and thiazolidinediones (TZD), through development of robust methodology for causal inference in a whole nation study. Research Design and Methods: A cohort study was performed including people with type 2 diabetes diagnosed in Scotland before 31 December 2017, who failed to reach HbA1c 48 mmol/mol despite metformin monotherapy and initiated second-line pharmacotherapy (SU/DPP4i/TZD) on or after 1 January 2010. The primary outcome was composite major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including hospitalization for myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, heart failure, and CV death. Secondary outcomes were each individual end point and all-cause death. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression and an instrumental variable (IV) approach were used to control confounding in a similar way to the randomization process in a randomized control trial. Results: Comparing SU to non-SU (DPP4i/TZD), the hazard ratio (HR) for MACE was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.91–1.09) from the multivariable Cox regression and 1.02 (0.91–1.13) and 1.03 (0.91–1.16) using two different IVs. For all-cause death, the HR from Cox regression and the two IV analyses was 1.03 (0.94–1.13), 1.04 (0.93–1.17), and 1.03 (0.90–1.17). Conclusions: Our findings contribute to the understanding that second-line SU for glucose lowering are unlikely to increase CV risk or all-cause mortality. Given their potent efficacy, microvascular benefits, cost effectiveness, and widespread use, this study supports that SU should remain a part of the global diabetes treatment portfolio.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:This work was supported by Health Data Research UK which receives its funding from HDR UK Ltd (HDR-5012) funded by the UK Medical Research Council, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, Department of Health and Social Care (England), Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates, Health and Social Care Research and Development Division (Welsh Government), Public Health Agency (Northern Ireland), British Heart Foundation (BHF), and the Wellcome Trust.
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Kennon, Professor Brian and Sattar, Professor Naveed and Petrie, Professor John
Authors: Wang, H., Cordiner, R. L.M., Huang, Y., Donnelly, L., Hapca, S., Collier, A., McKnight, J., Kennon, B., Gibb, F., McKeigue, P., Wild, S. H., Colhoun, H., Chalmers, J., Petrie, J., Sattar, N., MacDonald, T., McCrimmon, R. J., Morales, D. R., Pearson, E. R., Blackbourn, L., Cunningham, S., Gibb, F., Leese, G., Lindsay, R., McAllister, D., McGurnaghan, S., and Philip, S.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Health
College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Health & Wellbeing > Robertson Centre
College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing
Journal Name:Diabetes Care
Publisher:American Diabetes Association
ISSN:0149-5992
ISSN (Online):1935-5548
Published Online:21 March 2023

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record