Slater, J. (2023) Just judge: the jury on trial. American Philosophical Quarterly, 60(2), pp. 169-186. (doi: 10.5406/21521123.60.2.05)
![]() |
Text
294977.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only until 22 March 2024. 326kB |
Abstract
In this paper, I consider arguments in favor of jury trials. While I find these generally persuasive, I argue that there can be cases where juries are not fit for purpose. In those cases, I argue that they should be replaced by judge-only trials. In doing so, I propose a framework for determining whether a type of case is unsuitable for jury trials. Partly in response to low conviction rates, there have been recent suggestions that rape trials should be conducted without juries. I suggest that there is strong evidence that these offences qualify under the criteria I have described. As a result, I argue that judge-only trials should be adopted for trying rape cases. Content note: This paper discusses rape throughout.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Slater, Dr Joe |
Authors: | Slater, J. |
College/School: | College of Arts > School of Humanities > Philosophy |
Journal Name: | American Philosophical Quarterly |
Publisher: | University of Illinois Press |
ISSN: | 0003-0481 |
ISSN (Online): | 2152-1123 |
Published Online: | 22 March 2023 |
Copyright Holders: | Copyright © 2023 University of Illinois Press |
First Published: | First published in American Philosophical Quarterly 60(2):169-186 |
Publisher Policy: | Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record