Angelov, A., Connelly, P. J. , Delles, C. and Kararigas, G. (2023) Sex-biased and sex hormone-dependent regulation of apolipoprotein A1. Current Opinion in Physiology, 33, 100654. (doi: 10.1016/j.cophys.2023.100654)
![]() |
Text
294082.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only until 9 March 2024. 395kB |
Abstract
Pronounced sex differences in the development and outcome of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) exist. Apolipoprotein A1 (APOA1), the basic structural protein of high-density lipoprotein (HDL), is involved in key metabolic processes. However, its role in the pathogenesis of CVD is incompletely understood. The effects of biological sex on factors influencing the APOA1-lipid balance and the underlying mechanisms are also poorly understood. Here, we summarize evidence supporting sex-biased and sex hormone-dependent regulation of APOA1. In particular, we discuss sex-biased APOA1 genetic variation, sex differences in APOA1 regulation and cardiovascular physiology, and sex hormone-dependent regulation of APOA1 in cis- and transgender individuals. We put forward that studying the effects of biological sex will contribute to a better understanding of the role of APOA1 in cardiovascular physiology and its sex-biased association with CVD. Importantly, in situations of sex hormone therapy or inhibition, more sex-stratified data are required to inform clinical management of APOA1-related cardiovascular risk in a sex-dependent manner.
Item Type: | Articles |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID: | Delles, Professor Christian and Connelly, Dr Paul |
Authors: | Angelov, A., Connelly, P. J., Delles, C., and Kararigas, G. |
College/School: | College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Health |
Journal Name: | Current Opinion in Physiology |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
ISSN: | 2468-8681 |
ISSN (Online): | 2468-8673 |
Published Online: | 09 March 2023 |
Copyright Holders: | Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. |
First Published: | First published in Current Opinion in Physiology 33: 100654 |
Publisher Policy: | Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy |
University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record