Reflexivity in quantitative research: A rationale and beginner's guide

Jamieson, M. K., Govaart, G. H. and Pownall, M. (2023) Reflexivity in quantitative research: A rationale and beginner's guide. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 17(4), e12735. (doi: 10.1111/spc3.12735)

[img] Text
291255.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

288kB

Abstract

Reflexivity is the act of examining one's own assumption, belief, and judgement systems, and thinking carefully and critically about how these influence the research process. The practice of reflexivity confronts and questions who we are as researchers and how this guides our work. It is central in debates on objectivity, subjectivity, and the very foundations of social science research and generated knowledge. Incorporating reflexivity in the research process is traditionally recognized as one of the most notable differences between qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Qualitative research centres and celebrates the participants' personal and unique lived experience. Therefore, qualitative researchers are readily encouraged to consider how their own unique positionalities inform the research process and this forms an important part of training within this paradigm. Quantitative methodologies in social and personality psychology, and more generally, on the other hand, have remained seemingly detached from this level of reflexivity and general reflective practice. In this commentary, we, three quantitative researchers who have grappled with the compatibility of reflexivity within our own research, argue that reflexivity has much to offer quantitative methodologists. The act of reflexivity prompts researchers to acknowledge and centre their own positionalities, encourages a more thoughtful engagement with every step of the research process, and thus, as we argue, contributes to the ongoing reappraisal of openness and transparency in psychology. In this paper, we make the case for integrating reflexivity across all research approaches, before providing a ‘beginner's guide’ for quantitative researchers wishing to engage reflexively with their own work, providing concrete recommendations, worked examples, and reflexive prompts.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Jamieson, Ms Michelle
Authors: Jamieson, M. K., Govaart, G. H., and Pownall, M.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Social and Political Sciences
Journal Name:Social and Personality Psychology Compass
Publisher:Wiley
ISSN:1751-9004
ISSN (Online):1751-9004
Published Online:02 February 2023
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2023 The Authors
First Published:First published in Social and Personality Psychology Compass 17(4):e12735
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons licence

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record