Solonker Suture in East Asia and its bearing on the final closure of the eastern segment of the Palaeo-Asian Ocean

Eizenhöfer, P. and Zhao, G. (2018) Solonker Suture in East Asia and its bearing on the final closure of the eastern segment of the Palaeo-Asian Ocean. Earth Science Reviews, 186, pp. 153-172. (doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.09.010)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

The location and tectonic nature of the Solonker Suture in East Asia and hence the late Palaeozoic to early Mesozoic closure of the Palaeo-Asian Ocean have notoriously been enigmatic in the past decades due to limited rock exposure and the absence of unambiguous collision-related regional features. Several tectonic models have been proposed since, but in many cases these models were derived only from single key exposures or methodologies, often being over-simplified, or -interpreted, leading to questionable extrapolations on regional and global scales despite the complexity of the Palaeozoic accretionary tectonic framework. Now, the regionally consistent availability of geochronological, geochemical, stratigraphic and palaeo-geographic data enables us to integrate these into a highly detailed and coherent Palaeozoic tectonic review of the suture. The region across the Solonker Suture can generally be subdivided into three major Palaeozoic tectonic provinces, e.g., (i) a Sino-Cratonic Province that resembles the active Palaeozoic northern margin of the North China Craton to the south of the suture, (ii) a Mongolian Province that comprises the south-eastern margin of the Mongolian Terrane to the north of the suture, and (iii) an East Asian Pre-Pacific Province in north-east China that accreted with the Late Permian initiation of Pacific Plate subduction. The Sino-Cratonic Province experienced episodic tectonic activity that includes the accretion of the initially ensialic Bainaimiao Arc onto the passive northern margin of the North China Craton at ~ 437–453 Ma, subsequent southward directed subduction activity beneath the amalgamated margin until at least ~ 400 Ma, followed by a temporary cessation of magmatic activity accompanied by a switch from north- to southward directed continental drift, and finally concluded by renewed subduction activity until the final closure of the Palaeo-Asian Ocean. The Mongolian Province is suggested to have been more closely associated with the Siberian Craton before the presumably Late Devonian opening of the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean. The East Asian Pre-Pacific Province, originally rifted away from the eastern margin of Gondwana at ~ 600–750 Ma, recorded early Palaeozoic (~ 500 Ma) orogenic processes along the then northern margin of the Siberian Craton. The Baolidao arc system successively developed along the present-day south-eastern margin of the Mongolian Province due to continued subduction activity throughout the Palaeozoic. After the Middle Carboniferous opening of the Hegenshan back-arc basin renewed subduction beneath a matured Baolidao Arc during Carboniferous and Permian times led to the obduction of the Hegenshan ophiolite not earlier than ~ 270 Ma. Shortly after the Palaeo-Asian Ocean diachronously closed from west to east along the Solonker Suture in the Late Permian to Early Triassic. The East Asian Pre-Pacific Province re-attached itself by the mid-Mesozoic, followed by a change in the regional stress regime controlled by Palaeo-Pacific plate subduction. A divergent double-sided subduction model for the closure of the Palaeo-Asian Ocean provides, based on the reviewed data, a tectonic model that is not only able to reasonably well explain the absence of typical collision-related features in the region but also the abundance of Mesozoic A-type granitic magmatism in north-east China.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Eizenhoefer, Dr Paul
Authors: Eizenhöfer, P., and Zhao, G.
College/School:College of Science and Engineering > School of Geographical and Earth Sciences
Journal Name:Earth Science Reviews
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0012-8252
ISSN (Online):1872-6828

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record