Impact of covid-19 on subspecialty training in obstetrics and gynaecology

Currie, J. L.D., Saso, S., Guerrero, K. and Davies, M. (2022) Impact of covid-19 on subspecialty training in obstetrics and gynaecology. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 42(8), pp. 3545-3551. (doi: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2153654) (PMID:36534027)

Full text not currently available from Enlighten.

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic brought substantial changes in clinical practice in Obstetrics and Gynaecology (O and G). Redeployment of staff and restrictions in elective services raised training concerns. We sought to assess the impact on subspecialty training, to identify issues to help mitigate the impact. We conducted cross-sectional anonymous electronic surveys of UK subspecialty trainees at three time points: June 2020, February 2021, September 2021. Surveys were analysed by descriptive statistics and thematic analysis of free-text responses. Response rates ranged from 30% to 40%, with higher response rates from urogynaecology trainees. Up to 72% reported an impact on training, most notable in gynaecological subspecialties, and particularly urogynaecology, which persisted over time. More than a third anticipated needing extra time to complete training. This raises serious future workforce and patient care concerns. Clinical recovery should consider training needs as essential when re-establishing services. Subspecialty trainees may need additional time to achieve competencies required of future consultants.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Guerrero, Karen
Authors: Currie, J. L.D., Saso, S., Guerrero, K., and Davies, M.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing
Journal Name:Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Publisher:Taylor and Francis
ISSN:0144-3615
ISSN (Online):1364-6893
Published Online:19 December 2022

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record