Issues in design, conduct, and conclusions of JAMA's Hara et al.'s randomized clinical trial of spinal cord burst stimulation versus placebo stimulation on disability in patients with chronic radicular pain after lumbar spine surgery

Eldabe, S., Gilligan, C., Taylor, R. S. , Patel, K. V. and Duarte, R. V. (2023) Issues in design, conduct, and conclusions of JAMA's Hara et al.'s randomized clinical trial of spinal cord burst stimulation versus placebo stimulation on disability in patients with chronic radicular pain after lumbar spine surgery. Pain Practice, 23(3), pp. 232-233. (doi: 10.1111/papr.13186) (PMID:36504290)

[img] Text
288255.pdf - Accepted Version

296kB

Abstract

No abstract available.

Item Type:Articles (Editorial)
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Taylor, Professor Rod
Authors: Eldabe, S., Gilligan, C., Taylor, R. S., Patel, K. V., and Duarte, R. V.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Health & Wellbeing > MRC/CSO SPHSU
Journal Name:Pain Practice
Publisher:Wiley
ISSN:1530-7085
ISSN (Online):1533-2500
Published Online:11 December 2022
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2023 John Wiley & Sons
First Published:First published in Pain Practice 23(3):232-233
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record