“More person, and, therefore, more satisfied and happy”: The affective economy of reading promotion in Chile

Errázuriz, V. and García-González, M. (2021) “More person, and, therefore, more satisfied and happy”: The affective economy of reading promotion in Chile. Curriculum Inquiry, 51(2), pp. 229-260. (doi: 10.1080/03626784.2021.1915690)

[img] Text
287749.pdf - Accepted Version

1MB

Abstract

Reading is often regarded as a public good and an essential part of developing almost every aspect of human potential. In this article, we survey the “affective economies” of literary reading through a textual and visual analysis of documents issued by Chile’s Ministry of Education. Through a critical and diffractive reading of these documents with Ahmed’s (2004, 2010) and Braidotti’s (2018) conceptualizations of the affective, we claim that when reading is presented as beneficial, pleasurable, and promising, an assemblage of exclusion is set into motion. We describe how the affective repertoires in these documents reinforce oppressive and exclusionary neoliberal values under the guise of the promise of future happiness. The pleasure and happiness that can be achieved through literary reading, however, is only accessible to those who are willing to orientate themselves in the “right ways.” In this orientation, the cognitive is privileged over the emotional, and readers are supposed to learn to postpone any current demands for the promise of future happiness.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:This study was supported by the project ANID PIA CIE160007 and the project ANIDFondecyt 11800700.
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Garcia Gonzalez, Dr Macarena
Authors: Errázuriz, V., and García-González, M.
College/School:College of Social Sciences > School of Education
Journal Name:Curriculum Inquiry
Publisher:Wiley
ISSN:0362-6784
ISSN (Online):1467-873X
Published Online:10 May 2021
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2021 the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education
First Published:First published in Curriculum Inquiry 51(2):229-260
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record