Harmonized definition of occupational burnout: A systematic review, semantic analysis, and Delphi consensus in 29 countries

Canu, I. G. et al. (2021) Harmonized definition of occupational burnout: A systematic review, semantic analysis, and Delphi consensus in 29 countries. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 47(2), pp. 95-107. (doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3935) (PMID:33258478) (PMCID:PMC8114565)

[img] Text
287331.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

893kB

Abstract

Objective A consensual definition of occupational burnout is currently lacking. We aimed to harmonize the definition of occupational burnout as a health outcome in medical research and reach a consensus on this definition within the Network on the Coordination and Harmonisation of European Occupational Cohorts (OMEGA-NET). Methods First, we performed a systematic review in MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Embase (January 1990 to August 2018) and a semantic analysis of the available definitions. We used the definitions of burnout and burnout-related concepts from the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT) to formulate a consistent harmonized definition of the concept. Second, we sought to obtain the Delphi consensus on the proposed definition. Results We identified 88 unique definitions of burnout and assigned each of them to 1 of the 11 original definitions. The semantic analysis yielded a first proposal, further reformulated according to SNOMED-CT and the panelists` comments as follows: "In a worker, occupational burnout or occupational physical AND emotional exhaustion state is an exhaustion due to prolonged exposure to work-related problems”. A panel of 50 experts (researchers and healthcare professionals with an interest for occupational burnout) reached consensus on this proposal at the second round of the Delphi, with 82% of experts agreeing on it. Conclusion This study resulted in a harmonized definition of occupational burnout approved by experts from 29 countries within OMEGA-NET. Future research should address the reproducibility of the Delphi consensus in a larger panel of experts, representing more countries, and examine the practicability of the definition.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Kiran, Professor Sibel
Authors: Canu, I. G., Marca, S. C., Dell'Oro, F., Balazs, A., Bergamaschi, E., Besse, C., Bianchi, R., Bislimovska, J., Koscec Bjelajac, A., Bugge, M., Busneag, C., Caglayan, C., Cernitanu, M., Costa Pereira, C., Dernovscek Hafner, N., Droz, N., Eglite, M., Godderis, L., Gundel, H., Hakanen, J.J., Iordache, R.M., Khiredinne-Medouni, I., Kiran, S., Larese-Filon, F., Lazor-Blanchet, C., Legeron, P., Loney, T., Majery, N., Merisalu, E., Mehlum, I. S., Michaud, L., Mijakoski, D., Modenese, A., Minov, J., Molan, M., Otelea, M., van der Molen, H., Nena, E., Nolimal, D., Pletea, E., Pranjic, N., Rebergen, D., Reste, J., Schernhammer, E., and Wahlen, A.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Health & Wellbeing > Public Health
Journal Name:Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
Publisher:Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health
ISSN:0355-3140
ISSN (Online):1795-990X
Published Online:01 December 2020
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2021 The Authors
First Published:First published in Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 47(2):95-107
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons licence

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record