Predictors of occupational burnout: a systematic review

Shoman, Y. et al. (2021) Predictors of occupational burnout: a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(17), 9188. (doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179188) (PMID:34501782) (PMCID:PMC8430894)

[img] Text
287330.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

1MB

Abstract

We aimed to review occupational burnout predictors, considering their type, effect size and role (protective versus harmful), and the overall evidence of their importance. MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Embase were searched from January 1990 to August 2018 for longitudinal studies examining any predictor of occupational burnout among workers. We arranged predictors in four families and 13 subfamilies of homogenous constructs. The plots of z-scores per predictor type enabled graphical discrimination of the effects. The vote-counting and binomial test enabled discrimination of the effect direction. The size of the effect was estimated using Cohen’s formula. The risk of bias and the overall evidence were assessed using the MEVORECH and GRADE methods, respectively. Eighty-five studies examining 261 predictors were included. We found a moderate quality of evidence for the harmful effects of the job demands subfamily (six predictors), and negative job attitudes, with effect sizes from small to medium. We also found a moderate quality of evidence for the protective effect of adaptive coping (small effect sizes) and leisure (small to medium effect sizes). Preventive interventions for occupational burnout might benefit from intervening on the established predictors regarding reducing job demands and negative job attitudes and promoting adaptive coping and leisure.

Item Type:Articles
Additional Information:Funding The European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 801076, through the SSPH+ Global PhD Fellowship Pro-gram in Public Health Sciences (GlobalP3HS) of the Swiss School of Public Health partly supported the PhD position of YS. Unisanté supported the other part, via the General Directorate of Health of the Canton of Vaud via the grant of the Commission for Health Promotion and the Fight against Addictions Grant N° 8273/3636000000-801. This publication is based upon work from COST Action CA16216 (OMEGA-NET), supported by COST (European Cooperation in Sci-ence and Technology).
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Kiran, Professor Sibel
Creator Roles:
Kiran, S.Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review and editing
Authors: Shoman, Y., El May, E., Carla Marca, S., Wild, P., Bianchi, R., Drevvatne Bugge, M., Caglayan, C., Cheptea, D., Gnesi, M., Godderis, L., Kiran, S., McElvenny, D., Mediouni, Z., Sivesind Mehlum, I., Mijakoski, D., Minov, J., van der Molen, H. F., Nena, E., Ruxandra Oțelea, M., and Guseva Canu, I.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Health & Wellbeing > Public Health
Journal Name:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher:MDPI
ISSN:1661-7827
ISSN (Online):1660-4601
Published Online:31 August 2021
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2021 by the authors.
First Published:First published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18(17):9188
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons license

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record