Is it possible to measure good science?

Holding, A. N., McIntyre, K. R. and Lynch, P. T. (2023) Is it possible to measure good science? FEBS Journal, 290(8), pp. 2022-2028. (doi: 10.1111/febs.16674) (PMID:36447362)

[img] Text
286167.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

673kB

Abstract

Metrics play a vital part in the valuation and funding of research for scientists worldwide. We review the challenges that metrics pose in providing a fair and equitable system for research funding. We highlight the attempts with declarations, including the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (SF-DORA), to improve the research environment and specific impacts that metric choice can have on the evaluation and progression of Early Career Lecturers (ECLs). While there is much evidence that metrics will never be entirely satisfactory, we conclude there are opportunities that would benefit ECLs and reason for optimism for researchers.

Item Type:Articles
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:McIntyre, Dr Kirsty
Authors: Holding, A. N., McIntyre, K. R., and Lynch, P. T.
Subjects:Q Science > Q Science (General)
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing
Journal Name:FEBS Journal
Publisher:Wiley
ISSN:1742-464X
ISSN (Online):1742-4658
Published Online:29 November 2022
Copyright Holders:Copyright © 2022 The Authors
First Published:First published in FEBS Journal 290(8):2022-2028
Publisher Policy:Reproduced under a Creative Commons License

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record